Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIP-0045: spec the token receiver hook payload schema #457

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 10, 2022

Conversation

anorth
Copy link
Member

@anorth anorth commented Sep 8, 2022

This complements #455, answering the remaining TODOs currently noted there.

until the allocation's maximum term is reached.

Since new allocations are more valuable than existing ones, this proposal may incentivise
deal-focussed but capital- or capacity-constrained providers to let existing sectors expires

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
deal-focussed but capital- or capacity-constrained providers to let existing sectors expires
deal-focussed but capital- or capacity-constrained providers to let existing sectors expire

deal-focussed but capital- or capacity-constrained providers to let existing sectors expires
in order to re-use the associated pledge and hardware for newer allocations.

Storage providers may prefer deals associated with long data cap allocation terms to those with shorter expected terms.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this will only happen if FIP36 is introduced. And, in that case, the pledge will also be higher for longer-duration sectors. Thus, SPs with lower capital or more risk averse will prefer shorter sectors (and shorter deals)

@@ -653,18 +714,6 @@ and may be claimed by a collection of data commitments spread across multiple se
Such an allocation would be far more gas efficient than the multiple per-sector deals
required for a large data set today.

### Support for FIP-0036

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this section being removed? Is it no longer valid?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct (mainly because the opt-in migration of existing sectors was removed).

@kaitlin-beegle kaitlin-beegle merged commit c1c6f8f into master Sep 10, 2022
@kaitlin-beegle kaitlin-beegle deleted the anorth/fil+2 branch September 10, 2022 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants