Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: backport: #9455 #9463

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2022
Merged

deps: backport: #9455 #9463

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2022

Conversation

jennijuju
Copy link
Member

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • All commits have a clear commit message.
  • The PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, INTERFACE BREAKING CHANGE, CONSENSUS BREAKING, build, chore, ci, docs,perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area: api, chain, state, vm, data transfer, market, mempool, message, block production, multisig, networking, paychan, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • This PR has tests for new functionality or change in behaviour
  • If new user-facing features are introduced, clear usage guidelines and / or documentation updates should be included in https://lotus.filecoin.io or Discussion Tutorials.
  • CI is green

@jennijuju jennijuju changed the title devs: backport: 9455 devs: backport: #9455 Oct 10, 2022
@jennijuju jennijuju marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2022 21:20
@jennijuju jennijuju requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2022 21:20
@magik6k magik6k changed the title devs: backport: #9455 deps: backport: #9455 Oct 11, 2022
@arajasek arajasek merged commit ee47a89 into release/v1.18.0 Oct 13, 2022
@arajasek arajasek deleted the jen/backportmerkle branch October 13, 2022 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants