Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(dynamic_links)!: rework as part of #6979 #7263

Merged
merged 132 commits into from
Dec 4, 2021

Conversation

russellwheatley
Copy link
Member

@russellwheatley russellwheatley commented Oct 28, 2021

Description

Dynamic links rework as part of #6979

iOS

  • Removed method application:openURL:sourceApplication:annotation: as the documentation states its for iOS 8 & older when the deployment target of dynamic link iOS is 10.0. See here
  • iOS doesn't support multi-app but android does. I've implemented multi-app support for android, but the package will throw an exception if the user tries to use multi-app for iOS.

Related Issues

Replace this paragraph with a list of issues related to this PR from the issue database. Indicate, which of these issues are resolved or fixed by this PR. Note that you'll have to prefix the issue numbers with flutter/flutter#.

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]).
This will ensure a smooth and quick review process. Updating the pubspec.yaml and changelogs is not required.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • My PR includes unit or integration tests for all changed/updated/fixed behaviors (See Contributor Guide).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • The analyzer (melos run analyze) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require plugin users to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Oct 28, 2021
@russellwheatley russellwheatley marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2021 16:10
@russellwheatley russellwheatley changed the title refactor(dynamic_links): rework initial commit refactor(dynamic_links): rework as part of #6979 Oct 28, 2021
@russellwheatley russellwheatley changed the title refactor(dynamic_links): rework as part of #6979 refactor(dynamic_links)!: rework as part of #6979 Oct 28, 2021
Copy link
Member

@Ehesp Ehesp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing header licensing + the ignore_for_file should be removed on most files.

@russellwheatley russellwheatley mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2021
@Salakar Salakar changed the base branch from master to dev December 3, 2021 15:51
@Salakar Salakar merged commit 4d51bff into dev Dec 4, 2021
@Salakar Salakar deleted the @russell/dynamiclink-rework branch December 4, 2021 14:51
Salakar added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 4, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants