Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coreos-overlay/profiles: Add keywords for arm64 sdk #2012

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

jepio
Copy link
Member

@jepio jepio commented May 29, 2024

Add arm64 keywords for sdk packages

  • fero-client was previously keyworded but a revbump due to a dependency change resulted in the keyword not matching any longer
  • ccid is a new dep that is still marked ~arm64 in the Gentoo tree.

How to use

[ describe what reviewers need to do in order to validate this PR ]

Testing done

Testing with bootstrap_sdk when starting from dev container tarball as seed. These missing keywords show up in stage4.

[Describe the testing you have done before submitting this PR. Please include both the commands you issued as well as the output you got.]

  • Changelog entries added in the respective changelog/ directory (user-facing change, bug fix, security fix, update)
  • Inspected CI output for image differences: /boot and /usr size, packages, list files for any missing binaries, kernel modules, config files, kernel modules, etc.

@@ -27,7 +29,7 @@
=app-shells/bash-5.2_p26 ~amd64 ~arm64

# No keyword for arm64 yet.
=coreos-devel/fero-client-0.1.1 **
~coreos-devel/fero-client-0.1.1 **
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we just add the keyword to fero-client instead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'd say so too, it's our ebuild. On a tangent - we probably we should fork fero-client to flatcar org, because upstream is archived.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved keyword to the ebuild and deleted this entry from the profile

jepio added 2 commits May 29, 2024 16:11
ccid-1.5.4 is marked ~arm64 but is a depdendency of the Flatcar SDK. Keyword in
profile so that an arm64 SDK can be built.

Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <[email protected]>
fero-client is a dependency of the Flatcar SDK. Keyword it so that the Flatcar
SDK can be built for arm64. The keyword entry from the profile can be removed,
it wasn't used since the ebuild was upreved to -r1.

Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <[email protected]>
@jepio jepio force-pushed the profile-add-arm64-sdk-keywords branch from ab69bcf to 7c03353 Compare May 29, 2024 14:13
@jepio jepio enabled auto-merge May 29, 2024 15:24
@jepio jepio merged commit 6c0c06e into main May 29, 2024
7 checks passed
Copy link

Test report for 3983.0.0+nightly-20240527-2100 / amd64 arm64

Platforms tested : qemu_uefi-amd64 qemu_update-amd64 qemu_uefi-arm64 qemu_update-arm64

ok bpf.execsnoop 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok bpf.local-gadget 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.basic 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.cgroupv1 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.cloudinit.basic 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.cloudinit.multipart-mime 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.cloudinit.script 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.disk.raid0.data 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.disk.raid0.root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.disk.raid1.data 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.disk.raid1.root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.etcd-member.discovery 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.etcd-member.etcdctlv3 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.etcd-member.v2-backup-restore 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.filesystem 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.flannel.udp 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1)

ok cl.flannel.vxlan 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.instantiated.enable-unit 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.kargs 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.luks 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.oem.indirect 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (2) ❌ Failed: qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-arm64, run 1
    L1: "  "
    L2: " Error: _oem.go:199: Couldn_t reboot machine: machine __6d17c4d4-faf5-41ed-8707-193d71ebbad1__ failed basic checks: some systemd units failed:"
    L3: "??? ldconfig.service loaded failed failed Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache"
    L4: "status: "
    L5: "journal:-- No entries --"
    L6: "harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine 6d17c4d4-faf5-41ed-8707-193d71ebbad1 console_"
    L7: " "

ok cl.ignition.oem.indirect.new 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.oem.regular 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (3); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1) ❌ Failed: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1, 2)

                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-amd64, run 2
    L1: " Error: _oem.go:199: Couldn_t reboot machine: machine __d95f325d-4e04-45ed-beb5-dc6e3de07a6c__ failed basic checks: some systemd units failed:"
    L2: "??? ldconfig.service loaded failed failed Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache"
    L3: "status: "
    L4: "journal:-- No entries --"
    L5: "harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine d95f325d-4e04-45ed-beb5-dc6e3de07a6c console_"
    L6: " "
                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-amd64, run 1
    L1: " Error: _oem.go:199: Couldn_t reboot machine: machine __316bcd39-5f2c-40e2-b7dd-97fedf838435__ failed basic checks: some systemd units failed:"
    L2: "??? ldconfig.service loaded failed failed Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache"
    L3: "status: "
    L4: "journal:-- No entries --"
    L5: "harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine 316bcd39-5f2c-40e2-b7dd-97fedf838435 console_"
    L6: " "
    L7: "  "

ok cl.ignition.oem.regular.new 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.oem.reuse 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.oem.wipe 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.partition_on_boot_disk 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.symlink 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.translation 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.btrfsroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.ext4root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.groups 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.once 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.sethostname 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.users 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v1.xfsroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2.btrfsroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2.ext4root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2.users 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2.xfsroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2_1.ext4checkexisting 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2_1.swap 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.ignition.v2_1.vfat 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.install.cloudinit 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.internet 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.locksmith.cluster 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.misc.falco 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1)

ok cl.network.initramfs.second-boot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.network.listeners 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.network.wireguard 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.omaha.ping 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.osreset.ignition-rerun 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.overlay.cleanup 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (2) ❌ Failed: qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-arm64, run 1
    L1: "  "
    L2: " Error: _harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine c27effc5-595f-4212-910f-63b2160a356c console_"
    L3: " "

ok cl.swap_activation 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.sysext.boot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.sysext.fallbackdownload # SKIP 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tang.nonroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tang.root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.toolbox.dnf-install 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tpm.nonroot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tpm.root 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tpm.root-cryptenroll 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.tpm.root-cryptenroll-pcr-noupdate 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (2); qemu_uefi-arm64 (2) ❌ Failed: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-arm64, run 1
    L1: " Error: _tpm.go:344: could not reboot machine: machine __26fe9b13-f90f-434e-a5be-d28d82cda5d8__ failed basic checks: some systemd units failed:"
    L2: "??? ldconfig.service loaded failed failed Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache"
    L3: "status: "
    L4: "journal:-- No entries --_"
    L5: " "
    L6: " Error: _harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine 96669a28-1d4d-4fa6-8b79-357be188f0c4 console_"
    L7: " "
                Diagnostic output for qemu_uefi-amd64, run 1
    L1: " Error: _tpm.go:344: could not reboot machine: machine __26fe9b13-f90f-434e-a5be-d28d82cda5d8__ failed basic checks: some systemd units failed:"
    L2: "??? ldconfig.service loaded failed failed Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache"
    L3: "status: "
    L4: "journal:-- No entries --_"
    L5: " "
    L6: " Error: _harness.go:593: Found systemd unit failed to start (?[0;1;39mldconfig.service?[0m - Rebuild Dynamic Linker Cache.  ) on machine 96669a28-1d4d-4fa6-8b79-357be188f0c4 console_"
    L7: " "

ok cl.tpm.root-cryptenroll-pcr-withupdate 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.update.badverity 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.update.grubnop 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1)

ok cl.update.payload 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_update-amd64 (1); qemu_update-arm64 (1)

ok cl.update.reboot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.users.shells 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok cl.verity 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.auth.verify 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.groups 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.once 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.resource.local 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.resource.remote 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.resource.s3.versioned 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.security.tls 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.sethostname 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.ignition.systemd.enable-service 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.locksmith.reboot 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.locksmith.tls 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.selinux.boolean 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.selinux.enforce 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.tls.fetch-urls 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok coreos.update.badusr 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok devcontainer.docker 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok devcontainer.systemd-nspawn 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.btrfs-storage 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.containerd-restart 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.devicemapper-storage 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.enable-service.sysext 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.lib-coreos-dockerd-compat 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.network 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.selinux 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok docker.userns 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok extra-test.[first_dual].cl.update.docker-btrfs-compat 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_update-amd64 (1); qemu_update-arm64 (1)

ok extra-test.[first_dual].cl.update.payload 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_update-amd64 (1); qemu_update-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.calico.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.calico.cgroupv1.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.cilium.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.cilium.cgroupv1.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.flannel.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.27.6.flannel.cgroupv1.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.28.7.calico.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.28.7.cilium.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.28.7.flannel.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.29.2.calico.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.29.2.cilium.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok kubeadm.v1.29.2.flannel.base 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok linux.nfs.v3 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok linux.nfs.v4 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok linux.ntp 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok misc.fips 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok packages 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok sysext.custom-docker.sysext 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok sysext.custom-oem 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok sysext.disable-containerd 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok sysext.disable-docker 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok sysext.simple 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok systemd.journal.remote 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok systemd.journal.user 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

ok systemd.sysusers.gshadow 🟢 Succeeded: qemu_uefi-amd64 (1); qemu_uefi-arm64 (1)

@jepio jepio deleted the profile-add-arm64-sdk-keywords branch May 30, 2024 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants