-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve adding controller nodes to e2e/local-testing setups #48
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
invidian
added a commit
to invidian/libflexkube
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2020
So there is space to add more controller nodes if needed and they won't collide with workers or shift all addresses by one. Part of flexkube#48 Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <[email protected]>
I also got:
|
Except the error above, with upcoming fixes, adding new controller node works fine. |
The same errors appears when removing new controller node. But running Terraform twice fixes it. |
This was referenced Mar 27, 2020
invidian
added a commit
to invidian/libflexkube
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2020
When adding or removing controller node. Refs flexkube#48 Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <[email protected]>
invidian
added a commit
to invidian/libflexkube
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2020
When adding or removing controller node. Refs flexkube#48 Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <[email protected]>
invidian
added a commit
to invidian/libflexkube
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2020
So there is space to add more controller nodes if needed and they won't collide with workers or shift all addresses by one. Part of flexkube#48 Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <[email protected]>
invidian
added a commit
to invidian/libflexkube
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2020
So there is space to add more controller nodes if needed and they won't collide with workers or shift all addresses by one. Part of flexkube#48 Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are at least 2 things, which could be improved:
kube-apiserver
tokube-apiserver
withapi-loadbalancer
results in ports collision at the moment. Given that HAProxy footprint is really tiny, we should just always deploy it, so we are HA-ready.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: