We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Istio added in 2022 the ability to "warm up" traffic slowly with a new load balancer property called warmupDurationSecs https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/#LoadBalancerSettings
warmupDurationSecs
Flagger should also support LEAST_REQUEST loadbalancer configuration https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/#LoadBalancerSettings-SimpleLB
Add support for new istio loadbalancer features so a configuration like this would be possible
... trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: simple: LEAST_REQUEST warmupDurationSecs: 30s ...
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@recarga-brubs thanks for opening this issue. would you like to take it on?
Sorry, something went wrong.
@aryan9600 is there any chance to add this feature? It would be really helpful to enable this feature as shown in this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74517652/gradually-warm-java-application-in-k8s-with-istio
@aryan9600 Nice to meet you. I addressed this issue here. If I am wrong, please point it out to me.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the feature
Istio added in 2022 the ability to "warm up" traffic slowly with a new load balancer property called
warmupDurationSecs
https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/#LoadBalancerSettingsFlagger should also support LEAST_REQUEST loadbalancer configuration https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/#LoadBalancerSettings-SimpleLB
Proposed solution
Add support for new istio loadbalancer features so a configuration like this would be possible
Any alternatives you've considered?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: