Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[RFC-0002] Access control for cross-namespace source refs
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Stefan Prodan <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
stefanprodan committed Nov 23, 2021
1 parent e72214e commit 5cbf572
Showing 1 changed file with 157 additions and 0 deletions.
157 changes: 157 additions & 0 deletions rfcs/0002-source-acl/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
# RFC-0002 Access control for source references

## Summary

Cross-namespace references to Flux sources should be subject to
Access Control Lists (ACLs) as defined by the owner of a particular source.

## Motivation

As of v0.23.0, Flux allows for `Kustomizations` and `HelmReleases` to reference sources in different namespaces.
This poses a serious security risk for multi-tenant environments as Flux does not prevent tenants from accessing
known sources outside of their namespaces.

Flux does not allow for an `ImageUpdateAutomation` to reference a `GitRepository` in a different namespace.
This means users have to copy the Git auth secret and the `GitRepository` object in all namespaces
where `ImageUpdateAutomations` are used. This poses a serious security risk for multi-tenant environments,
as tenants could use the Git secret to push changes to repositories by impersonating Flux.

Flux allows for `ImagePolicies` to reference `ImageRepositories` in a different namespace only
if the ACL present on the `ImageRepository` grants access to the namespace where the `ImagePolicy` is.
This has been implemented in
[fluxcd/image-reflector-controller#162](https://github.com/fluxcd/image-reflector-controller/pull/162).

Flux should be consistent when dealing with cross-namespace references by extending the
Image Policy/Repository approach to all the other APIs.

### Goals

- Allow source owners to choose which sources are shared and with which namespaces.
- Allow cluster admins to enforce source ACLs.

### Non-Goals

- Enforce source ACLs by default.

## Proposal

Extend the current Image Policy/Repository ACL implementation to all the others Flux resources
as described in [flux2#1704](https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/issues/1704).

When a Flux resource (`Kustomization`, `HelmRelease` or `ImageUpdateAutomation`)
refers to a source (`GitRepository`, `HelmRepository` or `Bucket`) in a different namespace,
access is granted based on the source ACL.

The ACL check is performed only if `--enable-source-acl` flag is set to `true` for the following controllers:

- kustomize-controller
- helm-controller
- image-automation-controller

### User Stories

#### Story 1

> As a cluster admin, I want to share Helm Repositories approved by the platform team with all tenants.
If the owner of a Flux `HelmRepository` wants to grant access to the repository for all namespaces in a cluster,
an empty `matchLabels` can be used:

```yaml
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta1
kind: HelmRepository
metadata:
name: bitnami
namespace: flux-system
spec:
url: https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami
accessFrom:
namespaceSelectors:
- matchLabels: {}
```
If the `accessFrom` field is not present and `--enable-source-acl` is set to `true`,
means that a source can't be accessed from any other namespace but the one where it currently resides.

#### Story 2

> As a tenant, I want to share my app repository with another tenant
> so that they can deploy the application in their own namespace.

If `dev-team1` wants to grant read access to their repository to `dev-team2`,
a `matchLabels` that selects the namespace owned by `dev-team2` can be used:

```yaml
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta1
kind: GitRepository
metadata:
name: app1
namespace: dev-team1
spec:
url: ssh://[email protected]/<org>/app1-deploy
secretRef:
name: app1-ro-ssh-key
accessFrom:
namespaceSelectors:
- matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: dev-team2
```

#### Story 3

> As a cluster admin, I want to let tenants configure image automation in their namespaces by
> referring to a Git repository managed by the platform team.

If the owner of a Flux `GitRepository` wants to grant write access to `ImageUpdateAutomations` in a different namespace,
a `matchLabels` that selects the image automation namespace can be used:

```yaml
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta1
kind: GitRepository
metadata:
name: cluster-config
namespace: flux-system
spec:
url: ssh://[email protected]/<org>/cluster-config
secretRef:
name: read-write-ssh-key
accessFrom:
namespaceSelectors:
- matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: dev-team1
```

The `dev-team1` can refer to the `cluster-config` repository in their image automation config:

```yaml
apiVersion: image.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta1
kind: ImageUpdateAutomation
metadata:
name: app1
namespace: dev-team1
spec:
sourceRef:
kind: GitRepository
name: cluster-config
namespace: flux-system
```

### Alternatives

An alternative solution to source ACLs is showcased in the current multi-tenancy example, where an
admission controller such as Kyverno or OPA Gatekeeper is used to block cross-namespace access to sources.

Another alternative is to rely on impersonation and create a `ClusterRoleBinding` per named source and tenant account
as described in [fluxcd/flux2#582](https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/pull/582).

Yes another alternative is to introduce a new API kind `SourceReflection` as described in
[fluxcd/flux2#582-821027543](https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/pull/582#issuecomment-821027543).

And finally, this is more of an improvement of the current proposal, is for source-controller to compile the ACLs
to Kubernetes RBAC and dynamically create `ClusterRoleBindings` for all tenants accounts
every time a source or namespace changes as described in
[fluxcd/flux2#582-821388906](https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/pull/582#issuecomment-821388906).

## Implementation History

- ACL support for allowing cross-namespace access to `ImageRepositories` was first released in flux2 **v0.23.0**.

0 comments on commit 5cbf572

Please sign in to comment.