Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed Typescript Hard issue: Implement Fetch and Display Functions for Product List #649 #826

Conversation

hubsMIT1
Copy link
Contributor

@hubsMIT1 hubsMIT1 commented Oct 1, 2023

Description

fixes: #649

  • fetchData Function:
    Used fetch API to get data from https://dummyjson.com/products.
    Parsed JSON, updating global products.

  • displayProducts Function:
    Cleared previous table rows.
    Created HTML rows for each product.

  • applyFilters Function:
    Filtered products based on criteria.

Additional Context

Screenshot (96)

I'm new to open source. Please suggest for any additional implementations or ways to help me improve.
Thank you!

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 40 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +26 -14
Percentile : 16%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.ts : +26 -14

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Copy link
Member

@nikohoffren nikohoffren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

displayProducts(products);
try {
const response = await fetch('https://dummyjson.com/products');
const data = await response.json();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks really good! It is generally good idea to check if the response is actually ok with something like this:

if (!response.ok) {
    throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
}

Otherwise, i don't really see any major things that could be improved here, nicely done!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, next time i'll take care.
Thank you!

@nikohoffren nikohoffren merged commit 4a21d9b into fork-commit-merge:main Oct 2, 2023
6 checks passed
@nikohoffren
Copy link
Member

Merged

This is an automated message from Fork, Commit, Merge [BOT].

Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request has been merged. The files have been reset for the next contributor.

What's next?

If you're looking for more ways to contribute, I invite you to check out my other projects. Just click here to find more. These projects contain real issues that you can help resolve. You can also check out the Influences section in the README to find more projects similar to this one.

Also please leave a star to this project if you feel it helped you, i would really appreciate it.

I look forward to seeing your contributions!

nikohoffren pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…play-Functions-for-Product-List"

This reverts commit 4a21d9b, reversing
changes made to b4ccb68.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fork, Commit, Merge - Hard Issue (TypeScript)
2 participants