Pundit minus the rails/ active support dependencies! Designed for use with other ruby frameworks such as sinatra, hanami, trailblazer etc.
Pundit is focused around the notion of policy classes. We suggest that you put
these classes in app/policies
. This is a simple example that allows updating
a post if the user is an admin, or if the post is unpublished:
class PostPolicy
attr_reader :user, :post
def initialize(user, post)
@user = user
@post = post
end
def update?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
As you can see, this is just a plain Ruby class. Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class:
- The class has the same name as some kind of model class, only suffixed with the word "Policy".
- The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the
current_user
method to retrieve what to send into this argument - The second argument is some kind of model object, whose authorization you want to check. This does not need to be an ActiveRecord or even an ActiveModel object, it can be anything really.
- The class implements some kind of query method, in this case
update?
. Usually, this will map to the name of a particular controller action.
That's it really.
Usually you'll want to inherit from the application policy created by the generator, or set up your own base class to inherit from:
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def update?
user.admin? or not record.published?
end
end
In the generated ApplicationPolicy
, the model object is called record
.
Supposing that you have an instance of class Post
, Pundit now lets you do
this in your controller:
def update
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
authorize @post
if @post.update(post_params)
redirect_to @post
else
render :edit
end
end
The authorize method automatically infers that Post
will have a matching
PostPolicy
class, and instantiates this class, handing in the current user
and the given record. It then infers from the action name, that it should call
update?
on this instance of the policy. In this case, you can imagine that
authorize
would have done something like this:
unless PostPolicy.new(current_user, @post).update?
raise Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, "not allowed to update? this #{@post.inspect}"
end
You can pass a second argument to authorize
if the name of the permission you
want to check doesn't match the action name. For example:
def publish
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
authorize @post, :update?
@post.publish!
redirect_to @post
end
If you don't have an instance for the first argument to authorize
, then you can pass
the class. For example:
Policy:
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def admin_list?
user.admin?
end
end
Controller:
def admin_list
authorize Post # we don't have a particular post to authorize
# Rest of controller action
end
authorize
returns the object passed to it, so you can chain it like this:
Controller:
def show
@user = authorize User.find(params[:id])
end
You can easily get a hold of an instance of the policy through the policy
method in both the view and controller. This is especially useful for
conditionally showing links or buttons in the view:
<% if policy(@post).update? %>
<%= link_to "Edit post", edit_post_path(@post) %>
<% end %>
Given there is a policy without a corresponding model / ruby class, you can retrieve it by passing a symbol.
# app/policies/dashboard_policy.rb
class DashboardPolicy < Struct.new(:user, :dashboard)
# ...
end
# In controllers
authorize :dashboard, :show?
# In views
<% if policy(:dashboard).show? %>
<%= link_to 'Dashboard', dashboard_path %>
<% end %>
Often, you will want to have some kind of view listing records which a particular user has access to. When using Pundit, you are expected to define a class called a policy scope. It can look something like this:
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
class Scope
attr_reader :user, :scope
def initialize(user, scope)
@user = user
@scope = scope
end
def resolve
if user.admin?
scope.all
else
scope.where(published: true)
end
end
end
def update?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class:
- The class has the name
Scope
and is nested under the policy class. - The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the
current_user
method to retrieve what to send into this argument. - The second argument is a scope of some kind on which to perform some kind of
query. It will usually be an ActiveRecord class or a
ActiveRecord::Relation
, but it could be something else entirely. - Instances of this class respond to the method
resolve
, which should return some kind of result which can be iterated over. For ActiveRecord classes, this would usually be anActiveRecord::Relation
.
You'll probably want to inherit from the application policy scope generated by the generator, or create your own base class to inherit from:
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
class Scope < Scope
def resolve
if user.admin?
scope.all
else
scope.where(published: true)
end
end
end
def update?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
You can now use this class from your controller via the policy_scope
method:
def index
@posts = policy_scope(Post)
end
Just as with your policy, this will automatically infer that you want to use
the PostPolicy::Scope
class, it will instantiate this class and call
resolve
on the instance. In this case it is a shortcut for doing:
def index
@posts = PostPolicy::Scope.new(current_user, Post).resolve
end
You can, and are encouraged to, use this method in views:
<% policy_scope(@user.posts).each do |post| %>
<p><%= link_to post.title, post_path(post) %></p>
<% end %>
When you are developing an application with Pundit it can be easy to forget to
authorize some action. People are forgetful after all. Since Pundit encourages
you to add the authorize
call manually to each controller action, it's really
easy to miss one.
Thankfully, Pundit has a handy feature which reminds you in case you forget.
Pundit tracks whether you have called authorize
anywhere in your controller
action. Pundit also adds a method to your controllers called
verify_authorized
. This method will raise an exception if authorize
has not
yet been called. You should run this method in an after_action
hook to ensure
that you haven't forgotten to authorize the action. For example:
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
include Pundit
after_action :verify_authorized
end
Likewise, Pundit also adds verify_policy_scoped
to your controller. This
will raise an exception similar to verify_authorized
. However, it tracks
if policy_scope
is used instead of authorize
. This is mostly useful for
controller actions like index
which find collections with a scope and don't
authorize individual instances.
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
include Pundit
after_action :verify_authorized, except: :index
after_action :verify_policy_scoped, only: :index
end
This verification mechanism only exists to aid you while developing your
application, so you don't forget to call authorize
. It is not some kind of
failsafe mechanism or authorization mechanism. You should be able to remove
these filters without affecting how your app works in any way.
Some people have found this feature confusing, while many others
find it extremely helpful. If you fall into the category of people who find it
confusing then you do not need to use it. Pundit will work just fine without
using verify_authorized
and verify_policy_scoped
.
If you're using verify_authorized
in your controllers but need to
conditionally bypass verification, you can use skip_authorization
. For
bypassing verify_policy_scoped
, use skip_policy_scope
. These are useful
in circumstances where you don't want to disable verification for the
entire action, but have some cases where you intend to not authorize.
def show
record = Record.find_by(attribute: "value")
if record.present?
authorize record
else
skip_authorization
end
end
Sometimes you might want to explicitly declare which policy to use for a given class, instead of letting Pundit infer it. This can be done like so:
class Post
def self.policy_class
PostablePolicy
end
end
As you can see, Pundit doesn't do anything you couldn't have easily done yourself. It's a very small library, it just provides a few neat helpers. Together these give you the power of building a well structured, fully working authorization system without using any special DSLs or funky syntax or anything.
Remember that all of the policy and scope classes are just plain Ruby classes,
which means you can use the same mechanisms you always use to DRY things up.
Encapsulate a set of permissions into a module and include them in multiple
policies. Use alias_method
to make some permissions behave the same as
others. Inherit from a base set of permissions. Use metaprogramming if you
really have to.
Use the supplied generator to generate policies:
rails g pundit:policy post
In many applications, only logged in users are really able to do anything. If
you're building such a system, it can be kind of cumbersome to check that the
user in a policy isn't nil
for every single permission.
We suggest that you define a filter that redirects unauthenticated users to the login page. As a secondary defence, if you've defined an ApplicationPolicy, it might be a good idea to raise an exception if somehow an unauthenticated user got through. This way you can fail more gracefully.
class ApplicationPolicy
def initialize(user, record)
raise Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, "must be logged in" unless user
@user = user
@record = record
end
end
Pundit raises a Pundit::NotAuthorizedError
you can
rescue_from
in your ApplicationController
. You can customize the user_not_authorized
method in every controller.
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
protect_from_forgery
include Pundit
rescue_from Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, with: :user_not_authorized
private
def user_not_authorized
flash[:alert] = "You are not authorized to perform this action."
redirect_to(request.referrer || root_path)
end
end
Alternatively, you can globally handle Pundit::NotAuthorizedError's by having rails handle them as a 403 error and serving a 403 error page. Add the following to application.rb:
config.action_dispatch.rescue_responses["Pundit::NotAuthorizedError"] = :forbidden
NotAuthorizedError
s provide information on what query (e.g. :create?
), what
record (e.g. an instance of Post
), and what policy (e.g. an instance of
PostPolicy
) caused the error to be raised.
One way to use these query
, record
, and policy
properties is to connect
them with I18n
to generate error messages. Here's how you might go about doing
that.
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
rescue_from Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, with: :user_not_authorized
private
def user_not_authorized(exception)
policy_name = exception.policy.class.to_s.underscore
flash[:error] = t "#{policy_name}.#{exception.query}", scope: "pundit", default: :default
redirect_to(request.referrer || root_path)
end
end
en:
pundit:
default: 'You cannot perform this action.'
post_policy:
update?: 'You cannot edit this post!'
create?: 'You cannot create posts!'
Of course, this is just an example. Pundit is agnostic as to how you implement your error messaging.
Sometimes you want to retrieve a policy for a record outside the controller or view. For example when you delegate permissions from one policy to another.
You can easily retrieve policies and scopes like this:
Pundit.policy!(user, post)
Pundit.policy(user, post)
Pundit.policy_scope!(user, Post)
Pundit.policy_scope(user, Post)
The bang methods will raise an exception if the policy does not exist, whereas those without the bang will return nil.
In some cases your controller might not have access to current_user
, or your
current_user
is not the method that should be invoked by Pundit. Simply
define a method in your controller called pundit_user
.
def pundit_user
User.find_by_other_means
end
Pundit strongly encourages you to model your application in such a way that the only context you need for authorization is a user object and a domain model that you want to check authorization for. If you find yourself needing more context than that, consider whether you are authorizing the right domain model, maybe another domain model (or a wrapper around multiple domain models) can provide the context you need.
Pundit does not allow you to pass additional arguments to policies for precisely this reason.
However, in very rare cases, you might need to authorize based on more context than just the currently authenticated user. Suppose for example that authorization is dependent on IP address in addition to the authenticated user. In that case, one option is to create a special class which wraps up both user and IP and passes it to the policy.
class UserContext
attr_reader :user, :ip
def initialize(user, ip)
@user = user
@ip = ip
end
end
class ApplicationController
include Pundit
def pundit_user
UserContext.new(current_user, request.ip)
end
end
In Rails 4 (or Rails 3.2 with the
strong_parameters gem),
mass-assignment protection is handled in the controller. With Pundit you can
control which attributes a user has access to update via your policies. You can
set up a permitted_attributes
method in your policy like this:
# app/policies/post_policy.rb
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def permitted_attributes
if user.admin? || user.owner_of?(post)
[:title, :body, :tag_list]
else
[:tag_list]
end
end
end
You can now retrieve these attributes from the policy:
# app/controllers/posts_controller.rb
class PostsController < ApplicationController
def update
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
if @post.update_attributes(post_params)
redirect_to @post
else
render :edit
end
end
private
def post_params
params.require(:post).permit(policy(@post).permitted_attributes)
end
end
However, this is a bit cumbersome, so Pundit provides a convenient helper method:
# app/controllers/posts_controller.rb
class PostsController < ApplicationController
def update
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
if @post.update_attributes(permitted_attributes(@post))
redirect_to @post
else
render :edit
end
end
end
If you want to permit different attributes based on the current action, you can define a permitted_attributes_for_#{action}
method on your policy:
# app/policies/post_policy.rb
class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def permitted_attributes_for_create
[:title, :body]
end
def permitted_attributes_for_edit
[:body]
end
end
If you have defined an action-specific method on your policy for the current action, the permitted_attributes
helper will call it instead of calling permitted_attributes
on your controller.
Pundit includes a mini-DSL for writing expressive tests for your policies in RSpec.
Require pundit/rspec
in your spec_helper.rb
:
require "pundit/rspec"
Then put your policy specs in spec/policies
, and make them look somewhat like this:
describe PostPolicy do
subject { described_class }
permissions :update?, :edit? do
it "denies access if post is published" do
expect(subject).not_to permit(User.new(admin: false), Post.new(published: true))
end
it "grants access if post is published and user is an admin" do
expect(subject).to permit(User.new(admin: true), Post.new(published: true))
end
it "grants access if post is unpublished" do
expect(subject).to permit(User.new(admin: false), Post.new(published: false))
end
end
end
An alternative approach to Pundit policy specs is scoping them to a user context as outlined in this excellent post and implemented in the third party pundit-matchers gem.
- RailsApps Example Application: Pundit and Devise
- Migrating to Pundit from CanCan
- Testing Pundit Policies with RSpec
- Using Pundit outside of a Rails controller
- Straightforward Rails Authorization with Pundit
Licensed under the MIT license, see the separate LICENSE.txt file.