Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Income Tax Computation): computation of total tax exemption (backport #1902) #1907

Merged

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Fixes inconsistency in computation of total tax exemption and related fields while generating consecutive reports.

Before

Screenshot 2024-06-17 at 12 11 29 PM

After

Screenshot 2024-06-17 at 12 21 22 PM


This is an automatic backport of pull request #1902 done by Mergify.

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from ruchamahabal as a code owner June 19, 2024 06:27
@ruchamahabal ruchamahabal merged commit 87728ca into version-15-hotfix Jun 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/version-15-hotfix/pr-1902 branch June 19, 2024 06:46
frappe-pr-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
## [15.22.3](v15.22.2...v15.22.3) (2024-06-19)

### Bug Fixes

* add party and party type in PE (backport [#1894](#1894)) ([#1898](#1898)) ([aee96d1](aee96d1))
* **Expense Claim:** add permlevel 1 to approval status field ([7c77140](7c77140))
* hide approval status while creating new expense claim ([eaf14aa](eaf14aa))
* **Income Tax Computation:** computation of total tax exemption (backport [#1902](#1902)) ([#1907](#1907)) ([87728ca](87728ca))
* make request action sheet permission sensitive ([aa6d4c4](aa6d4c4))
* **PWA:** make fields readOnly based on permlevel ([33ccb2d](33ccb2d))
@frappe-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 15.22.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants