-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix consumer_power()
not working certain configurations.
#589
Conversation
23ee961
to
d0cea85
Compare
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ async def benchmark_data_sourcing( | |||
num_ev_chargers * len(COMPONENT_METRIC_IDS) * num_msgs_per_battery | |||
) | |||
mock_grid = MockMicrogrid( | |||
grid_side_meter=False, num_values=num_msgs_per_battery, sample_rate_s=0.0 | |||
main_meter=False, num_values=num_msgs_per_battery, sample_rate_s=0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest to call it grid_meter
as it's the successor to the GRID
component. The term main_meter
isn't helpful w.r.t. the meter placement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you're adding a add_consumer_meters
, then you might as well add a add_grid_meters
method and drop the flag. There has already been some talk about locations with multiple grid meters anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that' s the next step actually
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like this is not a good idea, because this makes our tests rely on the implementation rather than on just the expected behaviour. I think instead we should always add a main meter, and have special cases for graphs without main meters. Maybe we can discuss tomorrow during the meeting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added it to the agenda.
tests/timeseries/mock_microgrid.py
Outdated
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ def __init__( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments | |||
"""Create a new instance. | |||
|
|||
Args: | |||
grid_side_meter: whether the main meter should be on the grid side or not. | |||
main_meter: whether there is a main meter that is between grid and microgrid. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
whether there is a meter successor of the GRID
component.
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ async def test_grid_power_2( | |||
results: list[Quantity] = [] | |||
meter_sums: list[Quantity] = [] | |||
for count in range(10): | |||
await mockgrid.mock_resampler.send_meter_power([20.0 + count, 12.0, -13.0]) | |||
await mockgrid.mock_resampler.send_meter_power([20.0 + count, 12.0]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't the first value in the list send to the non existing meter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it doesn't really matter which values are used here as we simply sum them up and compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After discussing with Sahas, we should add a consumption meter here, because we are not testing the same case any longer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ async def test_grid_power_2( | |||
mocker: MockerFixture, | |||
) -> None: | |||
"""Test the grid power formula without a grid side meter.""" | |||
mockgrid = MockMicrogrid(grid_side_meter=False) | |||
mockgrid = MockMicrogrid(main_meter=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although one meter is removed, this test still works, since we compare the logical_meter
s power against the sum of all the other meters.
grid_production_recv = logical_meter.grid_production_power.new_receiver() | ||
grid_consumption_recv = logical_meter.grid_consumption_power.new_receiver() | ||
|
||
await mockgrid.mock_resampler.send_meter_power([2.5, 3.5, 4.0]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A Solar inverter that charges the PV panels? Interesting case 😂.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's the same power sum as the test above...
Bumps [pytest-cov](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov) from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/blob/master/CHANGELOG.rst">pytest-cov's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>4.1.0 (2023-05-24)</h2> <ul> <li>Updated CI with new Pythons and dependencies.</li> <li>Removed rsyncdir support. This makes pytest-cov compatible with xdist 3.0. Contributed by Sorin Sbarnea in <code>[frequenz-floss#558](pytest-dev/pytest-cov#558) <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/pull/558></code>_.</li> <li>Optimized summary generation to not be performed if no reporting is active (for example, when <code>--cov-report=''</code> is used without <code>--cov-fail-under</code>). Contributed by Jonathan Stewmon in <code>[frequenz-floss#589](pytest-dev/pytest-cov#589) <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/pull/589></code>_.</li> <li>Added support for JSON reporting. Contributed by Matthew Gamble in <code>[frequenz-floss#582](pytest-dev/pytest-cov#582) <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/pull/582></code>_.</li> <li>Refactored code to use f-strings. Contributed by Mark Mayo in <code>[frequenz-floss#572](pytest-dev/pytest-cov#572) <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/pull/572></code>_.</li> <li>Fixed a skip in the test suite for some old xdist. Contributed by a bunch of people in <code>[frequenz-floss#565](pytest-dev/pytest-cov#565) <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/pull/565></code>_.</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/2c9f2170d8575b21bafb6402eb30ca7de31e20b9"><code>2c9f217</code></a> Bump version: 4.0.0 → 4.1.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/4d245df8f75e434a9e1b162b51265d6a45017465"><code>4d245df</code></a> Update changelog and authors.</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/7b095c84ae521b14058d7d520ef36372849063a8"><code>7b095c8</code></a> Skip starting from xdist 3.0.2 (where boxed was removed).</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/605d6902b3b3d17aad0bf811b8c580fc895724ca"><code>605d690</code></a> disabling boxed test if version xdist newer than 2.5.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/76fb2a6cb2c4a4a788a5b62710848daf9c8fb7ce"><code>76fb2a6</code></a> introduced f-strings</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/0d63ede0d2ca9f4acc8329aa4261a7cec489ffdb"><code>0d63ede</code></a> Update test config. Reapply some of the changes from PR567 to the right file ...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/f3d8d8380f6a4b265353fe7cd509b040702f1e64"><code>f3d8d83</code></a> Add support for JSON reporter</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/dec02abeb9fa8ee3547baa054bde6006bea530ee"><code>dec02ab</code></a> Update test deps.</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/88a7d348986bace58e26c88a713ef35f900ce2ef"><code>88a7d34</code></a> chore: update AUTHORS and CHANGELOG</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/commit/74eb4cc8b684269b89735e31b623f0f9795c5d5c"><code>74eb4cc</code></a> perf: only call summary when the report will be used</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-cov/compare/v4.0.0...v4.1.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=pytest-cov&package-manager=pip&previous-version=4.0.0&new-version=4.1.0)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details>
updated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have some comments: #589 (comment)
blocking until we discuss tomorrow.
Renames the `grid_side_meter` parameter to be more understandable and explicit. Signed-off-by: Mathias L. Baumann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mathias L. Baumann <[email protected]>
In microgrids without consumers and no main meter, the formula would never return any values. Signed-off-by: Mathias L. Baumann <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It turns out my big objections were incorrect, I guess we just have to write more granular test cases in the future, so unblocking.
consumer_power()
not working certain configurations.In microgrids without consumers and no main meter, the formula
would never return any values.
This was undiscovered as we didn't test that scenario in the MockMicrogrid class used
for testing.