Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added option to use built-in, dispersive materials from Meep database #128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2022

Conversation

thomasdorch
Copy link
Contributor

This replaces the hard-coded index values in get_material.py and provides an option to switch dispersion on/off when needed. I haven't used this library extensively yet but to the best of my knowledge it doesn't break things.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #128 (1aa1c89) into master (3bf0b8b) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #128      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.64%   74.65%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         440      440              
  Lines       18374    18371       -3     
==========================================
  Hits        13715    13715              
+ Misses       4659     4656       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.65% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/get_material.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/get_simulation.py 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3bf0b8b...1aa1c89. Read the comment docs.

@joamatab joamatab merged commit 49769b2 into gdsfactory:master Jan 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants