-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obsolete "nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process"? #28860
Comments
Is this also a GO term that applies to a single gene product, and hence needs to be obsoleted in favor of a broader parent term for that reason? |
Not that I know of. |
I suspect this term exists because the regulation of the enzyme's synthesis is a major control point for downstream blood pressure regulation and the target process was needed for the logical definitions of the regulation terms. |
Aha, thanks @ukemi - it looks like you're right: id: GO:0051769 - 56 EXP annotations id: GO:0051770 - 44 EXP annotations id: GO:0051771 - 12 EXP annotations In that case, it seems the GO:0051767 should remain and I'll just remove the EC from its definition. I'd also add a comment to explain why we have the term to try to avoid future confusion. |
I decided not to add a public comment to try to explain why we have this term but no annotations, but I added a link to this ticket so that editors will be pointed to this little discussion. |
And I'm sure you're thinking the same as me....'I wonder if we could do this better in a specific GO-CAM model without the asserted term in the ontology'. |
This refers to the synthesis of a specific gene product - ther expression of many genes is specifically regulated, I dont think we want to create terms for each target. |
Right, that was my initial thought too, especially when I saw "nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process" had 0 annotations. So, the question is whether this is a special case where the "(regulation of the) synthesis of a specific gene product" is a valid GO term? |
An annotation / ontology structure question is whether this grouping term is needed to link all the child annotations mentioned above to the grandparent term GO:0009059 macromolecule biosynthetic process, or whether in a GO-CAM world the generic macromolecule process term plus the specific regulation term, all associated with NOS3 synthase enzyme (human P29474) and its associated molecular function GO:0004517 nitric-oxide synthase activity would capture all of the information and avoid the need for a gene product-specific GO term? (This is a question, not an argument.) |
GO:0051767 nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process may be better placed under GO:0010467 gene expression. There are similar terms like GO:0002781 antifungal peptide production in that the term itself has no annotations and its regulation terms do. As @ukemi @deustp01 alluded to, it's probably better to model the full information in GO-CAM than having these 'short-hand' terms, I think. |
One example of annotation is JAK2, based on PMID:11536325. @pgaudet Is it best that we obsolete nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process and its regulations and request re-annotation with GO-CAM? |
Discussion on the ontology editor's call: |
@pgaudet It turns out this term is used by the LD of CL:0000863 inflammatory macrophage. Thus it may be in the category of 'exceptions' you referred to regarding CL's needs. |
@cmungall says we should open a CL ticket to request that they revise the logical definition. @raymond91125 Can you please do that? |
id: GO:0051767
name: nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process
namespace: biological_process
alt_id: GO:0051768
def: "The chemical reactions and pathways resulting in the formation of a nitric-oxide synthase, an enzyme which catalyzes the reaction L-arginine + n NADPH + n H+ + m O2 = citrulline + nitric oxide + n NADP+." [EC:1.14.13.39, GOC:ai]
synonym: "brain nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "endothelial nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "inducible nitric-oxide synthase biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase (type 2) biosynthesis" NARROW []
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase (type 2) biosynthetic process" NARROW []
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase (type II) biosynthesis" NARROW []
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase (type II) biosynthetic process" NARROW []
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase 2 biosynthetic process" NARROW []
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase-1 biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase-2 biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "nitric-oxide synthase-3 biosynthetic process" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "NO synthase biosynthesis" EXACT []
synonym: "NO synthase biosynthetic process" EXACT []
synonym: "NOS biosynthesis" EXACT []
synonym: "NOS biosynthetic process" EXACT []
synonym: "NOS1 biosynthesis" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "NOS2 biosynthesis" NARROW [GOC:bf]
synonym: "NOS2 synthase biosynthesis" NARROW []
synonym: "NOS2 synthase biosynthetic process" NARROW []
synonym: "NOS3 biosynthesis" NARROW [GOC:bf]
is_a: GO:0009059 ! macromolecule biosynthetic process
This term appears to describe a BP synthesising the "nitric-oxide synthase" enzyme.
It is currently defined by the EC of that enzyme (which is correctly a term/def xref on the MF GO:0004517 nitric-oxide synthase activity).
GO:0051767 has 0 annotations.
I suggest it's obosoleted.
But if it's kept, then we should remove the EC def xref and find a better reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: