misc(ProgressiveBilling): Add missing specs for lifetime usage #2538
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vincent-pochet
changed the title
nudded
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2024
vincent-pochet
deleted the
feat-progressive-billing-transfer-historical-usage
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
AI companies want their users to pay before the end of a period if usage skyrockets. The problem being that self-serve companies can overuse their API without paying, triggering lots of costs on their side.
Description
This PR adds specs for the
subscription#mark_as_active!making sure that the lifetime usage object (including the historical usage) is transferred from a previous subscription to a newly activated one