Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤖 Add Validation for 'id' Field in ThreadDetails Model #1109

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sentry-autofix[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@sentry-autofix sentry-autofix bot commented Sep 3, 2024

👋 Hi there! This PR was automatically generated by Autofix 🤖

This fix was triggered by Jenn Mueng

Fixes SEER-9R

This update introduces a new field validator for the 'id' field in the ThreadDetails model. The validator ensures that the 'id' field is not None, raising a ValueError if it is. This change helps enforce data integrity by guaranteeing that the 'id' field always contains a valid value.

If you have any questions or feedback for the Sentry team about this fix, please email [email protected] with the Run ID (see below).

🤓 Stats for the nerds:

Run ID: 733
Prompt tokens: 48852
Completion tokens: 6013
Total tokens: 54865

…readDetails` model to handle `None` values gracefully. This validator raises a `ValueError` if the `id` is `None`, ensuring that only valid integers are accepted. This step is optional and can be skipped if the first step is sufficient.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants