Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(integrations): add async support for ai_track decorator #3373 #3376

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

czyber
Copy link
Contributor

@czyber czyber commented Jul 30, 2024

This commit adds capabilities to support async functions for the ai_track decorator

Closes #3373


General Notes

Thank you for contributing to sentry-python!

Please add tests to validate your changes, and lint your code using tox -e linters.

Running the test suite on your PR might require maintainer approval. Some tests (AWS Lambda) additionally require a maintainer to add a special label to run and will fail if the label is not present.

For maintainers

Sensitive test suites require maintainer review to ensure that tests do not compromise our secrets. This review must be repeated after any code revisions.

Before running sensitive test suites, please carefully check the PR. Then, apply the Trigger: tests using secrets label. The label will be removed after any code changes to enforce our policy requiring maintainers to review all code revisions before running sensitive tests.

czyber and others added 2 commits July 30, 2024 12:48
@sentrivana sentrivana added the Trigger: tests using secrets PR code is safe; run CI label Jul 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sentrivana sentrivana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @czyber!

I'm not a fan of the code duplication between the sync and async versions of the decorator but this is always tricky -- I think any attempt to dedup would actually make this more unreadable. So this is probably the best we can do.

@sentrivana sentrivana merged commit b658e4b into getsentry:master Jul 30, 2024
125 of 127 checks passed
@czyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

czyber commented Jul 30, 2024

@sentrivana totally get you on this one, initially i thought about trying to move stuff out but figured that would probably just compromise on readability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Trigger: tests using secrets PR code is safe; run CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

@ai_track() for asynchronous functions
2 participants