Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ImDrawData compression benchmarks #2

Closed
3 tasks done
ggerganov opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

ImDrawData compression benchmarks #2

ggerganov opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@ggerganov
Copy link
Owner

ggerganov commented Jul 1, 2019

Description

The goal is to create a simple framework for benchmarking various ImDrawData compression approaches by running them on the same input buffers and reporting the computation time and compression factors. This will help finding the best compression approach for #1

  • Record generated ImDrawData buffers generated from various scenes and store them in binary files
  • Implement a tool that reads those files and passes them to a custom compression function in the same way as if the buffers were generated by Dear ImGui. The tool would record the processing time and the output size.
  • Implement a tool that renders the binary files (i.e. replay) for display purposes
@ggerganov ggerganov added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 1, 2019
@ggerganov ggerganov pinned this issue Jul 1, 2019
ggerganov added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2019
Can be used to record and replay Dear ImGui's ImDrawData buffers.
ggerganov added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2019
Used to benchmark the performance of different ImDrawData compressors.
Currently reports compression ratio + estimated average bandwith for
a websocket client using such compressor.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant