ci: test gno.land when changing gnovm and tm2

[thehowl]

I'd like if we had good tests and decoupled components that could make this unnecessary. However I believe it's still the case that modifying something in tm2 and gnovm can create issues on gno.land without showing up on the CI, seeing as it is the component that strictly depends on both tm2 and gnovm.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.63%. Comparing base (aa9c64a) to head (e2a99fa).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2215      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.63%   54.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         581      581              
  Lines       77967    78077     +110     
==========================================
+ Hits        42601    42661      +60     
- Misses      32186    32235      +49     
- Partials     3180     3181       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
contribs/gnodev	23.81% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnofaucet	14.46% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnokeykc	0.00% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnomd	0.00% <ø> (ø)
gno.land	61.86% <ø> (ø)
gnovm	60.06% <ø> (ø)
misc/autocounterd	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genproto	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genstd	73.90% <ø> (ø)
misc/goscan	0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/logos	17.38% <ø> (ø)
misc/loop	0.00% <ø> (ø)
tm2	54.47% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ajnavarro]

I think this is going to mess up code coverage...

If we need some kind of integration tests, we should add them inside gno.land folder.

[thehowl]

I think this is going to mess up code coverage...

Wdym? How could this mess up the coverage?

[ajnavarro]

Nevermind, I thought that codecov will be confused if we added the same coverage for several tags, but it might not be the case.