Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added back unmerged update command on #1006 #1028

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Feb 23, 2017

On #1006, the protected branch's change on update.go was not merged.

@lunny lunny added the type/bug label Feb 23, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Feb 23, 2017
@appleboy
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 23, 2017
@appleboy
Copy link
Member

let L-G-T-M work

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 23, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Feb 23, 2017

close this one because of #1030

@lunny lunny closed this Feb 23, 2017
@lunny lunny removed this from the 1.1.0 milestone Feb 23, 2017
@tboerger tboerger added reviewed/invalid and removed type/bug lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 27, 2017
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/unmerged_update_command branch April 19, 2017 05:43
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
@delvh delvh added issue/not-a-bug The reported issue is the intended behavior or the problem is not inside Gitea and removed reviewed/invalid labels Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
issue/not-a-bug The reported issue is the intended behavior or the problem is not inside Gitea
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants