Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add loading yaml label template files (#22976) #23233

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Mar 1, 2023

Backport #22976
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive scoped labels in label templates

  • Move label template functionality to label module
  • Fix handling of color codes
  • Add Advanced label template

Extract from go-gitea#11669 and enhancement to go-gitea#22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates

* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
@lafriks lafriks added type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. labels Mar 1, 2023
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.19.0 milestone Mar 1, 2023
@lafriks lafriks closed this Mar 1, 2023
@lafriks lafriks deleted the feat/adv_labels branch March 1, 2023 23:49
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Mar 1, 2023

damn, backports are now automatic 😆 🎉

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 1, 2023
@lunny lunny removed this from the 1.19.0 milestone Mar 2, 2023
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants