Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant nil check in WalkGitLog #26773

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Remove redundant nil check in WalkGitLog #26773

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

Juneezee
Copy link
Contributor

From the Go specification:

"1. For a nil slice, the number of iterations is 0." https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range

Therefore, an additional nil check for before the loop is unnecessary.


Example: https://go.dev/play/p/xCk3Oba1R_0

From the Go specification:

  "1. For a nil slice, the number of iterations is 0." [1]

Therefore, an additional nil check for before the loop is unnecessary.

[1]: https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range

Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <[email protected]>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Aug 28, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 28, 2023
@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR!

For anyone reviewing this, it is easier when you hide the whitespace: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26773/files?diff=unified&w=1

@techknowlogick techknowlogick added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Aug 28, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Aug 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@silverwind silverwind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feels like this could be linted for.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Aug 28, 2023
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added this to the 1.21.0 milestone Aug 29, 2023
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Aug 29, 2023
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang enabled auto-merge (squash) August 29, 2023 00:36
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang merged commit ad3cbbc into go-gitea:main Aug 29, 2023
24 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Aug 29, 2023
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
* giteaofficial/main:
  Use `Set[Type]` instead of `map[Type]bool/struct{}`. (go-gitea#26804)
  Fix verifyCommits error when push a new branch (go-gitea#26664)
  Fix Uint8Array comparisons and update vitest (go-gitea#26805)
  Add various missing files-changed dependencies (go-gitea#26799)
  Improve flex list item padding (go-gitea#26779)
  Include the GITHUB_TOKEN/GITEA_TOKEN secret for fork pull requests (go-gitea#26759)
  feat(API): add route and implementation for creating/updating repository secret (go-gitea#26766)
  Replace deprecated `elliptic.Marshal` (go-gitea#26800)
  Updating the js libraries to latest version. (go-gitea#26795)
  Fix some slice append usages (go-gitea#26778)
  Use Go 1.21 for golangci-lint (go-gitea#26786)
  Fix notification circle (border-radius) (go-gitea#26794)
  Fix context filter has no effect in dashboard (go-gitea#26695)
  Add default label in branch select list (go-gitea#26697)
  Remove redundant nil check in `WalkGitLog` (go-gitea#26773)
  Remove fomantic `item` module (go-gitea#26775)
  Update info regarding internet connection for build (go-gitea#26776)
  Fix being unable to use a repo that prohibits accepting PRs as a PR source. (go-gitea#26785)
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants