-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
handle repository.size column being NULL in migration v263 #28336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Dec 4, 2023
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
label
Dec 4, 2023
delvh
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2023
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
and removed
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
labels
Dec 4, 2023
lafriks
reviewed
Dec 4, 2023
lunny
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
and removed
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
labels
Dec 5, 2023
lunny
added
backport/v1.21
This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.21
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
labels
Dec 5, 2023
lint error is related. |
lng2020
reviewed
Dec 5, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled
December 5, 2023 12:49
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
lng2020
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
lafriks
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
GiteaBot
pushed a commit
to GiteaBot/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
…28336) This resolves a problem I encountered while updating gitea from 1.20.4 to 1.21. For some reason (correct or otherwise) there are some values in `repository.size` that are NULL in my gitea database which cause this migration to fail due to the NOT NULL constraints. Log snippet (excuse the escape characters) ``` ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.573122395Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 ...ations/migrations.go:641:Migrate() [I] Migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.608705544Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 routers/common/db.go:36:InitDBEngine() [E] ORM engine initialization attempt go-gitea#3/10 failed. Error: migrate: migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table failed: NOT NULL constraint failed: repository.git_size ``` I assume this should be reasonably safe since `repository.git_size` has a default value of 0 but I don't know if that value being 0 in the odd situation where `repository.size == NULL` has any problematic consequences.
GiteaBot
added
backport/done
All backports for this PR have been created
and removed
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
labels
Dec 5, 2023
jolheiser
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
…28363) Co-authored-by: Nate Levesque <[email protected]>
zjjhot
added a commit
to zjjhot/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
* giteaofficial/main: Fix the runs will not be displayed bug when the main branch have no workflows but other branches have (go-gitea#28359) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin Render PyPi long description as document (go-gitea#28272) handle repository.size column being NULL in migration v263 (go-gitea#28336) Fix migration panic due to an empty review comment diff (go-gitea#28334) Add `HEAD` support for rpm repo files (go-gitea#28309) Remove deprecated query condition in ListReleases (go-gitea#28339)
fuxiaohei
pushed a commit
to fuxiaohei/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2024
…28336) This resolves a problem I encountered while updating gitea from 1.20.4 to 1.21. For some reason (correct or otherwise) there are some values in `repository.size` that are NULL in my gitea database which cause this migration to fail due to the NOT NULL constraints. Log snippet (excuse the escape characters) ``` ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.573122395Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 ...ations/migrations.go:641:Migrate() [I] Migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.608705544Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 routers/common/db.go:36:InitDBEngine() [E] ORM engine initialization attempt go-gitea#3/10 failed. Error: migrate: migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table failed: NOT NULL constraint failed: repository.git_size ``` I assume this should be reasonably safe since `repository.git_size` has a default value of 0 but I don't know if that value being 0 in the odd situation where `repository.size == NULL` has any problematic consequences.
silverwind
pushed a commit
to silverwind/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
…28336) This resolves a problem I encountered while updating gitea from 1.20.4 to 1.21. For some reason (correct or otherwise) there are some values in `repository.size` that are NULL in my gitea database which cause this migration to fail due to the NOT NULL constraints. Log snippet (excuse the escape characters) ``` ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.573122395Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 ...ations/migrations.go:641:Migrate() [I] Migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table ESC[36mgitea |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.608705544Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 routers/common/db.go:36:InitDBEngine() [E] ORM engine initialization attempt #3/10 failed. Error: migrate: migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table failed: NOT NULL constraint failed: repository.git_size ``` I assume this should be reasonably safe since `repository.git_size` has a default value of 0 but I don't know if that value being 0 in the odd situation where `repository.size == NULL` has any problematic consequences.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
backport/done
All backports for this PR have been created
backport/v1.21
This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.21
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
modifies/migrations
size/XS
Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This resolves a problem I encountered while updating gitea from 1.20.4 to 1.21. For some reason (correct or otherwise) there are some values in
repository.size
that are NULL in my gitea database which cause this migration to fail due to the NOT NULL constraints.Log snippet (excuse the escape characters)
I assume this should be reasonably safe since
repository.git_size
has a default value of 0 but I don't know if that value being 0 in the odd situation whererepository.size == NULL
has any problematic consequences.