Updated Dodge the Creeps C# to Godot mono 4.2

[captain-redbeard]

This change updates the C# Dodge the Creeps project to Godot 4.2 based on the updated documentation from here: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/getting_started/first_2d_game/index.html

Version: Godot mono 4.2

Changes

- Scene files changed to lowercase.

• Switched to explicit types as the documentation mentions that this should normally be used. (Needs documentation update to match code)
  - Removed particle effect as it's not in the documentation.
• Removed GD.Randomize() from Main.cs as it's not in the documentation.
• Reuse ShowMessage() method in HUD.cs. (Needs documentation update)

Possible issues

- Godot's editor defaults to tab indention, opening this project and saving any CS file will result in the indention being converted to tabs.
- Should we switch to tab indention to avoid this?

[AThousandShips]

See also:

• Port dodge the creeps C# to Godot 4 #870

[Calinou]

Sorry for the delay on this. Could you look into rebasing this PR against the latest master branch so we can merge this?

• Godot's editor defaults to tab indention, opening this project and saving any CS file will result in the indention being converted to tabs.
  • Should we switch to tab indention to avoid this?

Yes, I'd switch all C# files to use tabs. The docs always use spaces because we have to use spaces for indentation there, even in GDScript.

• Removed particle effect as it's not in the documentation.

The particle version is present in the GDScript version of the demo as well, so I'd prefer to keep it for consistency. We should look into amending the documentation eventually.

[AThousandShips]

This comment should be updated to talk about using the names

[captain-redbeard]

This comment should be updated to talk about using the names

I'm not sure what you mean?

[Calinou]

@captain-redbeard Bump 🙂

[aaronfranke]

Thank you for your work on this! I spent a few hours resolving the differences between this PR and #870, ensuring best practices, no regressions, and consistency with the tutorial in the documentation.

Ultimately what I ended up with was quite different from both PRs. I have pushed the consolidations to both PRs so that you can view them, but I can only accept one PR. As an arbitrary choice, I will be accepting this PR and closing PR #870. I will squash-and-merge and include @van800 as a co-author.