Make it possible to write expect.that(optional).isPresent()
, assertWithMessage(...).that(optional).isPresent()
, etc., including for Stream
as well as Optional
.
#1221
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make it possible to write
expect.that(optional).isPresent()
,assertWithMessage(...).that(optional).isPresent()
, etc., including forStream
as well asOptional
.That is, you no longer need to use
about(optionals())
(orabout(streams())
). (Later, we'll do the same thing for lesser-used APIs like `optionalInts().)This CL does not make it possible to write
Truth.assertThat(optional).isPresent()
: For that, you still need to useTruth8
. A future CL will eliminate the need to useTruth8
.This continues our work on #746.
RELNOTES=Added
that
overloads to make it possible to write type-specific assertions when usingexpect.that(optional)
andexpect.that(stream)
.