Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Truth Javadoc tweaks: #1345

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Truth Javadoc tweaks: #1345

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Truth Javadoc tweaks:

  • Continue changing docs to say "Checks that..." instead of "Fails unless...." I'd mentioned this in cl/680668770 but not done it. See also the somewhat similar cl/178917870.
  • Continue changing docs to say "value under test" instead of "subject" when referring to, well, the value under test. I'd done a little of this in cl/680668770.
  • Fill in some boilerplate Javadoc for the other assertThat overloads. I'd commented upon this in b/368371914. This continues a path that I've been very gradually pursuing in cl/166715211, cl/246871754, and cl/633264611.

This CL started as an excuse to see whether cl/681051228 has fixed #1343, but then I realized that I don't actually need a separate CL to test that. (Contrast to the Sonatype fix, which does require another CL.) But hey, it's not a bad thing to do, anyway.

RELNOTES=n/a

- Continue changing docs to say "Checks that..." instead of "Fails unless...." I'd mentioned this in cl/680668770 but not done it. See also the somewhat similar cl/178917870.
- Continue changing docs to say "value under test" instead of "subject" when referring to, well, the value under test. I'd done a little of this in cl/680668770.
- Fill in some boilerplate Javadoc for the other `assertThat` overloads. I'd commented upon this in b/368371914. This continues a path that I've been very gradually pursuing in cl/166715211, cl/246871754, and cl/633264611.

This CL started as an excuse to see whether cl/681051228 has fixed #1343, but then I realized that I don't actually need a separate CL to test that. (Contrast to the _Sonatype_ fix, which _does_ require another CL.) But hey, it's not a bad thing to do, anyway.

RELNOTES=n/a
PiperOrigin-RevId: 681080215
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 7547b9b into master Oct 1, 2024
1 check passed
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_681066698 branch October 1, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sonatype and Javadoc snapshots both failing since recently
1 participant