You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, impl_or_verify! doesn't support is_bit_valid, and so when feature = "derive" is disabled, we emit an is_bit_valid impl which unconditionally returns true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This replaces the implicit implementation, which accepted all values as
bit-valid, which was unsound.
While we're here, add more test cases to `test_impls` to test
hand-rolled `is_bit_valid` impls for other types.
Closes#897
This replaces the implicit implementation, which accepted all values as
bit-valid, which was unsound.
While we're here, add more test cases to `test_impls` to test
hand-rolled `is_bit_valid` impls for other types.
Closes#897
This replaces the implicit implementation, which accepted all values as
bit-valid, which was unsound.
While we're here, add more test cases to `test_impls` to test
hand-rolled `is_bit_valid` impls for other types.
Closesgoogle#897
Currently,
impl_or_verify!
doesn't supportis_bit_valid
, and so whenfeature = "derive"
is disabled, we emit anis_bit_valid
impl which unconditionally returnstrue
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: