Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the Spanner landing page. #4060

Merged

Conversation

lukesneeringer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer added the api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. label Sep 25, 2017
@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer added this to the Spanner Beta milestone Sep 25, 2017
@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer self-assigned this Sep 25, 2017
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 25, 2017
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@
'github_user': 'GoogleCloudPlatform',
'github_repo': 'google-cloud-python',
'github_banner': True,
'travis_button': True,

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

=======
^^^^^^^

`Cloud Spanner`_ is the world’s first fully managed relational database service

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@@ -14,19 +24,77 @@ Spanner
advanced-session-pool-topics
api-reference

API requests are sent to the `Cloud Spanner`_ API via RPC over
HTTP/2. In order to support this, we'll rely on `gRPC`_.
Spanner Client

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer merged commit c49b33a into googleapis:spanner-beta Sep 26, 2017
@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer deleted the spanner-landing-page branch September 26, 2017 14:39
@theacodes theacodes mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2017
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants