Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(typescript): noImplicitAny for IAM test file #501

Conversation

praveenqlogic
Copy link
Contributor

towards #313 (it's a good idea to open an issue first for discussion)

  • Tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 27, 2019
test/iam.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/iam.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #501 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #501   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.91%   94.91%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         984      984           
  Branches       83       83           
=======================================
  Hits          934      934           
  Misses         42       42           
  Partials        8        8

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cbb60c9...d55fd72. Read the comment docs.

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith merged commit 710eacd into googleapis:master Mar 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants