Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding EIPAssociation CRD and Controller to allow static EIP unassignment #16

Conversation

alabonte7
Copy link
Contributor

We would like this operator to unassign an EIP from a pod whenever a new CRD EIPAssociation is destroyed.

This would allow pods not to have direct owner reference to the EIP which would allow having static EIP and pods being able to assign this EIP on scale-up and unassigning it on scale-down

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/eip_association_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/eip_association_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/eip_association_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1alpha1/eip_association_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/eip_association_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/eip_association_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alfredkrohmer alfredkrohmer self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@alfredkrohmer alfredkrohmer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address the last 2 nitpicks, other than that looks good 🙂

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alfredkrohmer alfredkrohmer merged commit 4ffd565 into goto-opensource:main Jul 4, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
## [1.1.0](v1.0.1...v1.1.0) (2023-07-04)

### Features

* adding EIPAssociation CRD and controller to allow static EIP unassignment ([#16](#16)) ([4ffd565](4ffd565))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants