Support normalizr 3.0

[brunolemos]

Hi, it's almost done!
28 tests passing, only 2 remaining.
100% working!

---

While it's not merged, people can use my fork:

package.json:

"denormalizr": "https://github.com/brunolemos/denormalizr",

[paularmstrong]

I was thinking about supporting "denormalization" as a separate package https://github.com/paularmstrong/denormalizr. It extends normalizr, so it would be used as a drop-in replacement. However, I'm still working on writing "why" I think it's best to keep it separate...

[brunolemos]

@paularmstrong official denormalizer would be great! please consider supporting Immutablejs as well.

[brunolemos]

@paularmstrong they would fit well in the same npm package tbh

import { normalize, denormalize } from 'normalizr';

[fredefl]

Doesn't this commit:
paularmstrong/normalizr@2522bb9

Break your pull request @brunolemos? As such, the code provided still uses getKey() instead of .key.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e87dab5 on brunolemos:normalizr-3 into 08ede86 on gpbl:master.

[brunolemos]

Thanks @fredefl, updated the pull request!

And also found the problem with the 2 tests that were remaining.
It's actually the tests that were wrong, but I'll leave it to @gpbl to check it the change I made makes sense.
when defining a relationship should return the original response

100% working now!

[fredefl]

You're absolutely welcome @brunolemos!

I am actually already using your normalizr3 fix to denormalizr, and so far it has been rock solid. Thanks a bunch man!

[gpbl]

@brunolemos thanks for your PR and your work 👍

I'm on sabbatical without my laptop until the end of the month, so I'll be slow publishing this. Let me check the changes first :)

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8d33a7f on brunolemos:normalizr-3 into 08ede86 on gpbl:master.

[diegohaz]

Great work, @brunolemos. Thank you very much.

[brunolemos]

@diegohaz no problem! 🇧🇷

[paularmstrong]

FYI: paularmstrong/normalizr#214

[brunolemos]

@gpbl

[gpbl]

Sorry for the delay, I was traveling 🗺

This is published now as v0.5.0.

However, I wonder about this package since @paularmstrong has implemented it in the original module 😅

[brunolemos]

I was gonna say they don't support immutable by apparently it was added in the last version 😯 https://github.com/paularmstrong/normalizr/releases/tag/v3.2.0

[paularmstrong]

Speaking of which. Is there anything that this package supports that normalizr doesn't? Is it still helpful to keep two packages around that do the same thing?

[gpbl]

@paularmstrong

Is it still helpful to keep two packages around that do the same thing?

Not in my opinion 😄
I think this module should be deprecated. People were working on nice features however, such as memoization.

[paularmstrong]

I don't think I'd like to see memoization in normalizr. At Twitter, we use reselect to handle memoization at a higher level.

[gpbl]

Yup I don't see its need either. I believe I'll deprecate the package

[paularmstrong]

@gpbl awesome! Don't ever hesitate to reach out! You may also want to wait until paularmstrong/normalizr#238 gets in before deprecating.