Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

skip unnecessary initialization of empty items array #3962

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

yaacovCR
Copy link
Contributor

We can use a non-null assertion to access items on the completed StreamItemsRecord, similar to how data is accessed with a non-null assertion for completed DeferredGroupedFieldSet records, avoiding initialization of empty arrays/objects simply to avoid type errors.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eee6dbb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/compassionate-pike-271cb3/deploys/64ecd6f8dd386e0008867f01
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3962--compassionate-pike-271cb3.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@github-actions
Copy link

Hi @yaacovCR, I'm @github-actions bot happy to help you with this PR 👋

Supported commands

Please post this commands in separate comments and only one per comment:

  • @github-actions run-benchmark - Run benchmark comparing base and merge commits for this PR
  • @github-actions publish-pr-on-npm - Build package from this PR and publish it on NPM

@yaacovCR yaacovCR added the PR: polish 💅 PR doesn't change public API or any observed behaviour label Aug 28, 2023
@yaacovCR yaacovCR merged commit b12dcff into graphql:main Aug 28, 2023
20 checks passed
@yaacovCR yaacovCR deleted the no-unnecessary-array branch August 28, 2023 19:14
sakesun pushed a commit to sakesun/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
We can use a non-null assertion to access `items ` on the completed
StreamItemsRecord, similar to how `data` is accessed with a non-null
assertion for completed DeferredGroupedFieldSet records, avoiding
initialization of empty arrays/objects simply to avoid type errors.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: polish 💅 PR doesn't change public API or any observed behaviour
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants