Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: ARM: dts: tegra30-microsoft-surfacert: add label for gpio-keys #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2021

Conversation

jenneron
Copy link
Contributor

@jenneron jenneron commented Jul 5, 2021

I couldn't set up dtschema on my host, so i can't check it. Feel free to close PR if it doesn't pass lint check or something like that. As i said in IRC it is not very important. Actually the DT has more important things to do and i'm doing useless stuff. I also don't know where it is documented. I used for reference upstream device-trees.

Before patch:

microsoft-surfacert:~$ evtest
No device specified, trying to scan all of /dev/input/event*
Not running as root, no devices may be available.
Available devices:
/dev/input/event0:	gpio-keys
...

After patch:

microsoft-surfacert:~$ evtest
No device specified, trying to scan all of /dev/input/event*
Not running as root, no devices may be available.
Available devices:
/dev/input/event0:	GPIO Buttons
...

@digetx
Copy link
Member

digetx commented Jul 5, 2021

Thanks!

@digetx digetx merged commit 1158d96 into grate-driver:master Jul 5, 2021
okias pushed a commit to okias/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit 78d9d80 ]

When CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y, calling dump_stack() can always trigger
NULL pointer dereference panic similar as below:

[    0.396060] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc5+ grate-driver#47
[    0.396692] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.397176] Call Trace:
[    0.398191] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000960
[    0.399487] Oops [#1]
[    0.399739] Modules linked in:
[    0.400135] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc5+ grate-driver#47
[    0.400570] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.400926] epc : walk_stackframe+0xc4/0xdc
[    0.401291]  ra : dump_backtrace+0x30/0x38
[    0.401630] epc : ffffffff80004922 ra : ffffffff8000496a sp : ffffffe000f3bd00
[    0.402115]  gp : ffffffff80cfdcb8 tp : ffffffe000f30000 t0 : ffffffff80d0b0cf
[    0.402602]  t1 : ffffffff80d0b0c0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffe000f3bd60
[    0.403071]  s1 : ffffffff808bc2e8 a0 : 0000000000001000 a1 : 0000000000000000
[    0.403448]  a2 : ffffffff803d7088 a3 : ffffffff808bc2e8 a4 : 6131725dbc24d400
[    0.403820]  a5 : 0000000000001000 a6 : 0000000000000002 a7 : ffffffffffffffff
[    0.404226]  s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.404634]  s5 : ffffffff803d7088 s6 : ffffffff808bc2e8 s7 : ffffffff80630650
[    0.405085]  s8 : ffffffff80912a80 s9 : 0000000000000008 s10: ffffffff804000fc
[    0.405388]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000043 t4 : ffffffffffffffff
[    0.405616]  t5 : 000000000000003d t6 : ffffffe000f3baa8
[    0.405793] status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: 0000000000000960 cause: 000000000000000d
[    0.406135] [<ffffffff80004922>] walk_stackframe+0xc4/0xdc
[    0.407032] [<ffffffff8000496a>] dump_backtrace+0x30/0x38
[    0.407797] [<ffffffff803d7100>] show_stack+0x40/0x4c
[    0.408234] [<ffffffff803d9e5c>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb6
[    0.409019] [<ffffffff8040423e>] ptdump_init+0x20/0xc4
[    0.409681] [<ffffffff800015b6>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x226
[    0.410110] [<ffffffff80401094>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x258
[    0.410562] [<ffffffff803dba88>] kernel_init+0x22/0x148
[    0.410959] [<ffffffff800029e2>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x14
[    0.412241] ---[ end trace b2ab92c901b96251 ]---
[    0.413099] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b

The reason is the task is NULL when we finally call walk_stackframe()
the NULL is passed from __dump_stack():

|static void __dump_stack(void)
|{
|        dump_stack_print_info(KERN_DEFAULT);
|        show_stack(NULL, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
|}

Fix this issue by checking "task == NULL" case in walk_stackframe().

Fixes: eac2f30 ("riscv: stacktrace: fix the riscv stacktrace when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER enabled")
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Wende Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
digetx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2021
i915 will soon gain an eviction path that trylock a whole lot of locks
for eviction, getting dmesg failures like below:

  BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
  turning off the locking correctness validator.
  depth: 48  max: 48!
  48 locks held by i915_selftest/5776:
   #0: ffff888101a79240 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x88/0x160
   #1: ffffc900009778c0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.63+0x39/0x1b0 [i915]
   #2: ffff88800cf74de8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.63+0x5f/0x1b0 [i915]
   #3: ffff88810c7f9e38 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin_ww+0x1c4/0x9d0 [i915]
   #4: ffff88810bad5768 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
   #5: ffff88810bad60e8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
  ...
   #46: ffff88811964d768 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
   #47: ffff88811964e0e8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
  INFO: lockdep is turned off.

Fixing eviction to nest into ww_class_acquire is a high priority, but
it requires a rework of the entire driver, which can only be done one
step at a time.

As an intermediate solution, add an acquire context to
ww_mutex_trylock, which allows us to do proper nesting annotations on
the trylocks, making the above lockdep splat disappear.

This is also useful in regulator_lock_nested, which may avoid dropping
regulator_nesting_mutex in the uncontended path, so use it there.

TTM may be another user for this, where we could lock a buffer in a
fastpath with list locks held, without dropping all locks we hold.

[peterz: rework actual ww_mutex_trylock() implementations]
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
okias pushed a commit to okias/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
The test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault:

  # ./test_tag
  [  130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70
  [  130.640501] Oops[#3]:
  [  130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G      D    O       6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf grate-driver#47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a
  [  130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
  [  130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40
  [  130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000
  [  130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000
  [  130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70
  [  130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0
  [  130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0
  [  130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000
  [  130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000
  [  130.641900]    ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988
  [  130.642007]   ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988
  [  130.642112]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
  [  130.642261]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
  [  130.642353]  EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE)
  [  130.642458]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
  [  130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
  [  130.642658]  BADV: ffff80001b898004
  [  130.642719]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
  [  130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)]
  [  130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd)
  [  130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8
  [  130.643213]         0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0
  [  130.643378]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000
  [  130.643538]         0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000
  [  130.643685]         00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [  130.643831]         ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000
  [  130.643983]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558
  [  130.644131]         0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [  130.644276]         9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc
  [  130.644423]         ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0
  [  130.644572]         ...
  [  130.644629] Call Trace:
  [  130.644641] [<9000000003137f7c>] build_body+0xd8/0x4988
  [  130.644785] [<900000000313ca94>] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec
  [  130.644891] [<90000000032acfb0>] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0
  [  130.645003] [<90000000032b3504>] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44
  [  130.645089] [<90000000032b6744>] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588
  [  130.645175] [<90000000032b8388>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c
  [  130.645259] [<9000000003f6ab38>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94
  [  130.645369] [<9000000003121c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158
  [  130.645507]
  [  130.645539] Code: 380839f6  380831f9  28412bae <24000ca6> 004081ad  0014cb50  004083e8  02bff34c  58008e91
  [  130.645729]
  [  130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

On my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at
loading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions:

  prog = (struct bpf_prog *)ffff80001b894000
  insn = (struct bpf_insn *)(prog->insnsi)ffff80001b894048
  insn + 2039 = (struct bpf_insn *)ffff80001b898000 <- end of the page

In the build_insn() function, we are trying to access next instruction
unconditionally, i.e. `(insn + 1)->imm`. The address lies in the next
page and can be not owned by the current process, thus an page fault is
inevitable and then segfault.

So, let's access next instruction only under `dst = imm64` context.

With this fix, we have:

  # ./test_tag
  test_tag: OK (40945 tests)

Fixes: bbfddb9 ("LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case")
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants