Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transient multifield style #946

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Transient multifield style #946

merged 7 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

oriolcg
Copy link
Member

@oriolcg oriolcg commented Oct 5, 2023

Modifications to accommodate MultiFieldStyle to TransientMultifieldFESpaces.

@oriolcg oriolcg added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 5, 2023
@oriolcg oriolcg self-assigned this Oct 5, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #946 (6d12a51) into master (06e95ba) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 66.15%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #946      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.24%   88.17%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         176      176              
  Lines       20897    20934      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        18441    18458      +17     
- Misses       2456     2476      +20     
Files Coverage Δ
src/MultiField/BlockSparseMatrixAssemblers.jl 98.21% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
src/MultiField/MultiFieldFESpaces.jl 82.48% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ODEs/TransientFETools/TransientFESpaces.jl 75.00% <62.06%> (-13.75%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@JordiManyer JordiManyer merged commit 8ebe624 into master Oct 16, 2023
7 checks passed
@JordiManyer JordiManyer deleted the Transient_MultifieldStyle branch October 16, 2023 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants