Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set compat for AbstractTrees as in Gridap #73

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

ericneiva
Copy link
Member

AbstractTrees v0.3 is incompatible with latest versions of SymbolicUtils (see JuliaSymbolics/SymbolicUtils.jl#564).

Letting GE use AbstractTrees v0.4, as in Gridap, s.t. it can be composed with SymbolicUtils.

AbstractTrees v0.3 is incompatible with latest versions of SymbolicUtils
(see JuliaSymbolics/SymbolicUtils.jl#564).

Letting GE use AbstractTrees v0.4, as in Gridap, s.t. it can be composed
with SymbolicUtils.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4aad36d) 83.43% compared to head (f993330) 83.43%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #73   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.43%   83.43%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        2258     2258           
=======================================
  Hits         1884     1884           
  Misses        374      374           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ericneiva ericneiva merged commit 4cf152d into master Dec 12, 2023
7 checks passed
@ericneiva
Copy link
Member Author

For the record, letting GE use AbstractTrees v0.4, allowed to upgrade the major version of Documenter (after fixing some breaking changes).

@ericneiva ericneiva deleted the bump_compat_AbstractTrees branch December 12, 2023 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants