Cross-browser compatibility

[joggee-fr]

The README indicates the extension as expected to be cross-browser compatible.
Has anyone tested the extension with something else than Firefox?

WebExtension is supposed to be supported by these main browsers:

• Firefox
• Edge
• Chrome
• Opera

https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Build_a_cross_browser_extension

@gurumukhi, are you interested in make this extension compatible with other browsers?

[gurumukhi]

I tested it initially, not sure about it after after recent changes. It would be great if it continues to work across browsers.

…

On Thu, 10 Nov, 2022, 02:25 Jonathan GUILLOT, ***@***.***> wrote: The README indicates the extension as expected to be cross-browser compatible. Has anyone tested the extension with something else than Firefox? WebExtension is supposed to be supported by these main browsers: - Firefox - Edge - Chrome - Opera https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Build_a_cross_browser_extension @gurumukhi <https://github.com/gurumukhi>, are you interested in make this extension compatible with other browsers? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#26>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAU7ELJR6XHOS3WCUMSMLNDWHQFVPANCNFSM6AAAAAAR33D7CA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[joggee-fr]

I gave it a quick try and adding webextension-polyfill from Mozilla seems to be a good help for this. There is several methods to add it to sources e.g. using npm to manage dependencies (my preferred option).

@gurumukhi, does it feel like a reasonable solution for you or do you prefer youtube-screenshot to stay away from such an extra build step?
Adding npm may also be nice to add command to package the add-on in a ZIP archive for distribution.

[gurumukhi]

We can give npm a try 👍