Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the build to build.sbt style #16

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

eed3si9n
Copy link

@eed3si9n eed3si9n commented Dec 6, 2015

No description provided.

@eed3si9n
Copy link
Author

eed3si9n commented Dec 6, 2015

Travis says:

*** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/java terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f760b90ee57]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x108d50)[0x7f760b90dd50]
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libnet.so(Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_getLocalHostName+0x190)[0x7f75f9a57960]
[0x7f7601012d98]

I even tested that it runs on Travis first https://travis-ci.org/sbt/sbinary/jobs/95235720. Travis also said "This job ran on our new platform for Legacy Precise builds. Please read our blog post for more information." so maybe the setting needs to be changed to Docker-based build. I can try to nudge that from .travis.yml.

@dwijnand
Copy link

dwijnand commented Dec 9, 2015

I learnt from Seth that although using Docker is the new default, you remain on the legacy infrastructure unless you're explicit.

Should this be closed in favour of sbt#1?

@eed3si9n
Copy link
Author

eed3si9n commented Dec 9, 2015

I learnt from Seth that although using Docker is the new default, you remain on the legacy infrastructure unless you're explicit.

I knew about the legacy infrastructure. It's one thing to be on legacy infrastructure, but it's another that calling java errors in "buffer overflow detected." I think it's a bug on Travis CI that happened after their recent Legacy Precise migration. See travis-ci/travis-ci#5227

Should this be closed in favour of sbt#1?

harrah/sbinary is the upstream, which currently is set to publish under org.scala-tools.sbinary organization. sbt/sbinary is a fork so I can publish it under org.scala-sbt.sbinary. Since the first thing I did was up update the build, I figured the right thing to do was to contribute my change back to the upstream.

@dwijnand
Copy link

dwijnand commented Dec 9, 2015

Makes sense.

On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:52 eugene yokota [email protected] wrote:

I learnt from Seth that although using Docker is the new default, you
remain on the legacy infrastructure unless you're explicit.

I knew about the legacy infrastructure. It's one thing to be on legacy
infrastructure, but it's another that calling java errors in "buffer
overflow detected." I think it's a bug on Travis CI that happened after
their recent Legacy Precise migration
https://blog.travis-ci.com/2015-11-27-moving-to-a-more-elastic-future.
See travis-ci/travis-ci#5227
travis-ci/travis-ci#5227

Should this be closed in favour of sbt#1
sbt#1?

harrah/sbinary is the upstream, which currently is set to publish under
org.scala-tools.sbinary organization. sbt/sbinary is a fork so I can
publish it under org.scala-sbt.sbinary. Since the first thing I did was
up update the build, I figured the right thing to do was to contribute my
change back to the upstream.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment).

@xuwei-k xuwei-k deleted the wip/project branch September 22, 2016 05:24
eed3si9n added a commit to eed3si9n/sbinary that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2018
@eed3si9n eed3si9n closed this Aug 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants