Daily rewards for active nodes #1064

Neeharika-Sompalli · 2024-10-17T00:54:54Z

Creates a HIP for proposing daily rewards for active nodes

netlify · 2024-10-17T00:55:10Z

✅ Deploy Preview for hedera-hips ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	`72146fd`
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/hedera-hips/deploys/672d0f10f89cea000835a2d0
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1064--hedera-hips.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

HIP/hip-1064.md

jsync-swirlds

Some wording improvements, a few suggestions for different arrangement, and improvements to specification protocol buffer text.

HIP/hip-1064.md

netopyr

LGTM - thanks @Neeharika-Sompalli

Signed-off-by: Neeharika-Sompalli <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Joseph S. <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Neeharika Sompalli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Neeharika-Sompalli <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Neeharika-Sompalli <[email protected]>

jsync-swirlds

A question about the added definition for judges.

jsync-swirlds · 2024-11-07T19:56:35Z

HIP/hip-1064.md

+<dd>An event that wins the election to be made a judge. It must be a witness, and it will have tended to have been 
+gossiped to most of the other nodes quickly (otherwise it would have lost the election). An event reaches consensus
+when it is an ancestor of all judges in a given round. The first round where that happens is its consensus round. 
+It’s a math theorem that every round is guaranteed to have at least one judge, and a math conjecture that every round
+is guaranteed to have judges created by a supermajority of nodes (>2/3 of weight).</dd>


This confuses me a bit.
Does the following express the same concepts?

Suggested change

<dd>An event that wins the election to be made a judge. It must be a witness, and it will have tended to have been

gossiped to most of the other nodes quickly (otherwise it would have lost the election). An event reaches consensus

when it is an ancestor of all judges in a given round. The first round where that happens is its consensus round.

It’s a math theorem that every round is guaranteed to have at least one judge, and a math conjecture that every round

is guaranteed to have judges created by a supermajority of nodes (>2/3 of weight).</dd>

<dd>An event wins an election to be made a judge. To win the election an event

must be a witness, and it will tend to be gossiped to most of the other nodes

quickly (otherwise it would have lost the election).

An event reaches consensus when it is an ancestor of all judges in a given round.

The first round where that happens is its consensus round. It is a mathematic

theorem that every round is guaranteed to have at least one judge, and a

mathematic conjecture that every round is guaranteed to have judges created

by a supermajority of nodes (>2/3 of consensus weight).</dd>

One thing that is missing:
What is the actual criteria for "winning" the election?
Is it the first set of events that qualify as witnesses for the round?
Is it the first set of events that qualify as "famous witnesses"?

Neeharika-Sompalli requested a review from mgarbs as a code owner October 17, 2024 00:54

Neeharika-Sompalli requested review from rbair23, netopyr, tinker-michaelj and Mark-Swirlds October 17, 2024 01:14

rbair23 reviewed Oct 17, 2024

View reviewed changes