Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plan to support setting service metadata via registrator? #697

Closed
tayzlor opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Any plan to support setting service metadata via registrator? #697

tayzlor opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
type/enhancement Proposed improvement or new feature

Comments

@tayzlor
Copy link

tayzlor commented Feb 13, 2015

I had a search but could not find anything around this in consul and/or registrator.
See https://github.com/progrium/registrator/issues/52 for some background.
Are there are plans to support registering metadata with the service in consul like this?

@armon
Copy link
Member

armon commented Feb 17, 2015

@tayzlor Yes, there is another open ticket to support adding metadata to services which could then be used downstream by registrator.

@armon armon added the type/enhancement Proposed improvement or new feature label Feb 17, 2015
@pccowboy
Copy link

@armon Can you post that other ticket's ID? I am interested in following that effort, and seeing if I can contribute to it.

@armon
Copy link
Member

armon commented Mar 12, 2015

@pccowboy It's not a specific issue I guess, but a collection:

Basically, it's to support K/V tags on Nodes / Checks / Services. My guess is this will require a v2 API that allows us to rethink things a bit.

@slackpad
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is covered in other issues, closing as a duplicate.

duckhan pushed a commit to duckhan/consul that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2021
duckhan pushed a commit to duckhan/consul that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2021
…#697)

* Allow registering the same service in multiple namespaces.

* Added changelog entry
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/enhancement Proposed improvement or new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants