Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: api_management_api #2073

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from

Conversation

torresdal
Copy link
Contributor

Added next resource in the API Management family as requested in #1177

For now this resource is quite basic with main focus on importing API's through swagger/wsdl. Remaining future options for this resource would typically depend on other not yet developed resources which is in the pipeline (like Authorization and Product).

Note: In API Management API the concepts of Revisions and Versions are supported, but I'm not sure those concepts belong in this Terraform resource, since they are more deployment concepts and not infrastructure. Because of this I've omitted them for now, except as computed values. If you agree with this we should probably say something about that in the docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @torresdal

Thanks for this PR :)

I've taken a look through and this is off to a good start - I've left some questions/comments inline, particularly around exposing soap_pass_through vs the api_type - but most of the comments I've left are fairly minor and this is looking pretty good 👍

Thanks!

azurerm/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_api_management_api.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_api_management_api.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_api_management_api.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_api_management_api.go Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/api_management_api.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/api_management_api.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/api_management_api.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/api_management_api.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/api_management_api.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@torresdal
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tombuildsstuff I've resolved the ones that I've made code changes to, but left the ones I've commented on un-resolved. Could you please have a look at my comments, so we can find a solution to those, and then I'll push my changes?

@torresdal
Copy link
Contributor Author

torresdal commented Oct 25, 2018

Just pushed the changes we did so far as a result of the review. Only thing missing now is to have a look at the unresolved items in the review and agree on a solution for each.

Basically agree on what to do with:

  • api_type
  • to use IsNewResource / ForceNew for Import or not

torresdal and others added 16 commits November 22, 2018 13:28
* Replaced soap_api_type with bool soap_pass_through
* Added validation for api path and name
* Added validation tests for api path and name
* Fixed basic data test and include more props to check
* Replaced test data with files instead of pointing to urls
* Add complete test for API Management API
* Ignore import, since state is only persisted in Terraform
* Removed location from schema
* Add seperate get after creating resource to get ID
@torresdal
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tombuildsstuff Anything else I should do or we should agree on before moving this on?

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Nov 27, 2018
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: 1.20.0, 1.21.0 Dec 7, 2018
@torresdal torresdal closed this Dec 13, 2018
@katbyte katbyte removed this from the 1.21.0 milestone Jan 15, 2019
@AndyMoore
Copy link
Contributor

can this be reopened and added to a future release?

@tombuildsstuff @katbyte @torresdal

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 5, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 5, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants