Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update elb_service_account docs #10299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2016
Merged

Update elb_service_account docs #10299

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2016

Conversation

miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the .id instead if the .arn syntax.

Once updated to the .arn, no changes are detected.

[ci skip]

The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the `.id` instead if the `.arn` syntax.

Once updated to the `.arn`, no changes are detected.

[ci skip]
@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Historical context: #8700

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Nov 23, 2016

Thanks :) This LGTM!

@stack72 stack72 merged commit afe9388 into hashicorp:master Nov 23, 2016
stack72 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2016
The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the `.id` instead if the `.arn` syntax.

Once updated to the `.arn`, no changes are detected.

[ci skip]
gusmat pushed a commit to gusmat/terraform that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2016
The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the `.id` instead if the `.arn` syntax.

Once updated to the `.arn`, no changes are detected.

[ci skip]
fatmcgav pushed a commit to fatmcgav/terraform that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the `.id` instead if the `.arn` syntax.

Once updated to the `.arn`, no changes are detected.

[ci skip]
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 19, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants