-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: add WASM job #656
CI: add WASM job #656
Conversation
45430fe
to
dd91633
Compare
3aa36d9
to
2068636
Compare
@amesgen @TerrorJack any clues what's up with WASM CI job here?
|
Maybe try using |
I've seen something just like this Windows/9.8 failure before, in CI for the |
716cb07
to
409b4fc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I'm fully competent to review this, but it looks very plausible and seems to be working as expected.
* Don't build tests with threaded runtime on WASM * Skip lifting tests on WASM * Tests: improve reporting of mismatches for IO tests * Add WASM CI job * CI: upgrade incantations for emualted tests
* Don't build tests with threaded runtime on WASM * Skip lifting tests on WASM * Tests: improve reporting of mismatches for IO tests * Add WASM CI job * CI: upgrade incantations for emualted tests
Draft, just to get feedback from GHA.