Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bridge-method-annotation should be an optional dep #378

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2018

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Contributor

@jglick jglick commented Sep 13, 2017

b6e48cc introduced a hard dep on a lib which is newer than that currently bundled in core, causing problems for requireUpperBoundDeps.

@reviewbybees

pom.xml Outdated
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
<groupId>com.infradna.tool</groupId>
<artifactId>bridge-method-annotation</artifactId>
<version>1.14</version>
<optional>true</optional>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

or scope provided?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either seem to work pretty much the same.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 13, 2017

This pull request originates from a CloudBees employee. At CloudBees, we require that all pull requests be reviewed by other CloudBees employees before we seek to have the change accepted. If you want to learn more about our process please see this explanation.

@vivek
Copy link

vivek commented Sep 14, 2017

LGTM 🐝

@recampbell
Copy link

recampbell commented Sep 14, 2017

@reviewbybees done

@kohsuke kohsuke merged commit 1e497d2 into hub4j:master Jan 13, 2018
@jglick jglick deleted the bridge-method-annotation branch January 17, 2018 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants