This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
Make Codegen Faster Through Less Allocations #269
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Maddiaa0
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thank you @ec2 and thank you to @jimjbrettj for introducing you!
Awesome stuff, much cleaner!
Merged
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Removed a lot of expensive cloning in favour of passing references in the codegen phase. I tried to do this with minimal refactoring.
Codegen is about 75% faster now for the erc20 benchmark.
Thanks for @jimjbrettj for introducing my to Huff, this has been fun and educational.
Before:
After:
