Strange TIM_USE_FW_MOTOR assignment in DALRCF405 target

[Tygrys-1]

file DALRCF405/target.c

This look strange, as the S1 and S6 are using the same timer for FW_MOTOR and FW_SERVO.
S6 should be FW_MOTOR

DEF_TIM(TIM3, CH3, PB0,  TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR | TIM_USE_MC_SERVO | TIM_USE_FW_MOTOR, 0, 0),   // S1 (1,7)  <----------
DEF_TIM(TIM8, CH1, PC6,  TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR |                    TIM_USE_FW_SERVO, 0, 0),   // S2 (2,2)
DEF_TIM(TIM1, CH3, PA10, TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR |                    TIM_USE_FW_SERVO, 0, 0),   // S3 (2,6)
DEF_TIM(TIM1, CH1, PA8,  TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR |                    TIM_USE_FW_SERVO, 0, 1),   // S4 (2,1)  (2.3 2.6)
DEF_TIM(TIM8, CH3, PC8,  TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR |                    TIM_USE_FW_SERVO, 0, 0),   // S5 (2,4)  (2.2)
DEF_TIM(TIM3, CH4, PB1,  TIM_USE_MC_MOTOR |                    TIM_USE_FW_SERVO, 0, 0),   // S6 (1,2)  <-----------

[digitalentity]

Indeed, this would create a problem if anybody is using S6. Although, a workaround is to stick to conventional PWM

[Tygrys-1]

Does iNav has always two motors as a convention, or it is needed for something? This target has only one motor, so maybe it should be FW_MOTOR at S6?

[digitalentity]

Two motors is not a convention. I'm not sure if any body is using this board for twin-motor or if S6 is in use at all. Most people fly either a wing (1 motor + 2 servos) or a conventional airplane (1 motor + 4 servos).