export partial and strict

[iambumblehead]

support these

import esmock, { partial, strict } from 'esmock'

esmock(...args)
esmock.p(...args)
esmock.partial(...args)
esmock.partial.p(...args)
esmock.strict(...args)
esmock.strict.p(...args)
partial(...args)
partial.p(...args)
strict(...args)
strict.p(...args)

[iambumblehead]

@jakebailey I hope it is not rude to ask for your help. The esmock's interface is not easily described in typescript and I'm not sure how to achieve passing results here. I don't want the types file to be big but maybe its inevitable. Would you give me your advice?

[iambumblehead]

where the typescript errors occur, this issue seems related microsoft/TypeScript#22063

if typescript supported simplified function declarations this file would be easier to write

[iambumblehead]

I'm leaning toward exporting partial as the default, with high-chance the next PR would change that. I need to mention it because it would be obnoxious if I take help from you, then, right after, change the interface in some way you disagree with.

[jakebailey]

I'm leaning toward exporting partial as the default, with high-chance the next PR would change that. I need to mention it because it would be obnoxious if I take help from you, then, right after, change the interface in some way you disagree with.

Don't worry about it, it's your library. Truthfully I can't use it anymore because of bugs with loaders and coverage gathering. :(

[iambumblehead]

probably "esmock.partial.p" and "esmock.strict.p" will be dropped from the tests. typescript doesn't handle the inteface

[iambumblehead]

@tripodsan please review

I'm interested to make a follow-up PR that sets partial as the default export for the 2.0 release

[iambumblehead]

typescript tests are passing here and so changes here do work with typescript, though I haven't used them in typescript-aware editor.

[iambumblehead]

screenshots from terminal emacs and vscode. I think it is OK this way,

[tripodsan]

LGTM