Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Use 'unbuild' instead of 'remove' in kernel prerm script
When DKMS is invoked by the kernel_prerm.d_dkms script to remove modules from a kernel that is being removed, it uses the DKMS 'remove' command. If there are no other installations of the module, it will be removed completely from DKMS. That seems to be an undesirable side-effect and predates the introduction of the DKMS 'unbuild' command which merely undoes the 'install' and 'build' steps. Change the script to use 'unbuild' instead of 'remove'. Keep the echoed message that says "dkms: removing: ..." because "dkms: unbuilding: ..." may be confusing to the user. I have tested it by removing a kernel with a module installed by DKMS that was the only installed instance of the module. Without the change, the module was removed completely from DKMS. With the change, the module was removed from the kernel, but was not removed completely. On reinstalling the kernel, the module was rebuilt and reinstalled for the kernel by DKMS. This change was suggested by @RalfGoebel for issue dell#37 and might be Debian-specific. For Debian and Ubuntu, the 'kernel_postinst.d_dkms' script is installed as '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms' and '/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms', and the 'kernel_prerm.d_dkms' script is installed as '/etc/kernel/prerm.d/dkms'. The scripts are invoked in the following circumstances, with the script parameter $1 set to the kernel version from the kernel package (referred to as "${KVER}" below): 1. When a "linux-headers-${KVER}" package is installed (containing the stuff needed to build external modules), the '/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms' ('kernel_postinst.d_dkms') script is invoked to autoinstall DKMS modules for the kernel version, building the modules if necessary. 2. When a "linux-image-${KVER}" package is installed (containing the Linux kernel binary, and in the case of Debian, also the kernel module binaries), the '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms ('kernel_postinst.d_dkms') script is invoked to autoinstall DKMS modules for the kernel version, building the modules if necessary and possible. (Building the modules will fail unless the "linux-headers-${KVER}" package is installed.) 3. When a "linux-headers-${KVER}" package is being removed, none of the DKMS scripts are invoked. 4. When a "linux-image-${KVER}" package is being removed, the '/etc/kernel/prerm.d/dkms' ('kernel_prerm.d_dkms') script is invoked to perform some sort of uninstallation action on all DKMS modules that have been built for the kernel version. Prior to this patch, the DKMS 'remove' command was used to uninstall the modules. This patch changes that to the DKMS 'unbuild' command which is less destructive. On first glance, it may seem better to use the DKMS 'uninstall' command when removing a "linux-image-${KVER}" package, and to use the DKMS 'unbuild' command when removing a "linux-headers-${KVER}" package. However, the "linux-image-${KVER}" and "linux-headers-${KVER}" packages do not depend on each other, so unbuilding the DKMS modules when the "linux-headers-${KVER}" package is being removed would have the side effect of uninstalling the DKMS modules for the kernel, even if the "linux-image-${KVER}" package is still installed. Therefore, the compromise is to use the DKMS 'unbuild' command when removing a "linux-image-${KVER}" package and to do nothing when removing a "linux-headers-${KVER}" package. This helps avoid littering the '/var/lib/dkms' directory with stale builds. It is sub-optimal if the same version of the "linux-image-${KVER}" package is to be reinstalled later because the DKMS modules would need to be built again, but that should be fairly rare. Normally, kernel packages are upgraded to a different version, requiring the DKMS modules to be built anyway. The script only affects DKMS modules with the "installed" status. Only DKMS modules with the "installed" status have files in "/lib/modules/${KVER}" that need to be cleaned up. It could be argued that since the script is using the DKMS 'unbuild' command, it should also unbuild DKMS modules with the "built" status. There must have been some external intervention outside of the kernel installation/removal hook scripts to leave those modules at the "built" status, so the script may be playing it safe by leaving those DKMS modules alone. Link: dell#37 (comment) Tested-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information