Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows ARM support (Runtime) #198

Closed
wasabii opened this issue Oct 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Windows ARM support (Runtime) #198

wasabii opened this issue Oct 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wasabii
Copy link
Contributor

wasabii commented Oct 29, 2022

SDK support will be absent since Windows ARM32 is largely abandoned, except for IoT devices, where it makes sense to have runtime support.

@wasabii wasabii added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 29, 2022
@wasabii wasabii changed the title Windows ARM support Windows ARM support (Runtime) Nov 17, 2022
@wasabii wasabii closed this as completed Nov 19, 2022
@paulirwin
Copy link

Hi, thanks for this! I am getting an error trying to build a project that was previously using 8.1 but now has been updated to use 8.4.5 and .NET 6. Attempting to build with Visual Studio 2022 17.5 on Windows on ARM. Getting the following error:

{truncated_path}\.nuget\packages\ikvm.msbuild\8.4.5\buildTransitive\netstandard2.0\IKVM.MSBuild.Tasks.targets(25,9): error MSB4044: The "IkvmGetReferenceAssemblies" task was not given a value for the required parameter "ToolPath".

I have the latest Microsoft Open JDK build for arm64 installed. Any ideas on what to try?

@wasabii
Copy link
Contributor Author

wasabii commented Mar 14, 2023

@paulirwin

Um. I'm a bit confused what the question is about.

This bug was about runtime support for ARM (not ARM64).

You're asking about building using IKVM. Which would be SDK support. Which I believe is #197. Which is currently unsupported. And I'm pretty sure it never has been.

And OpenJDK isn't required for using IKVM in any capacity.

@paulirwin
Copy link

@wasabii Thanks, I did not realize there was that distinction. I'll follow the other issue for updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants