Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

teal framework Release #66

Open
donyunardi opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

teal framework Release #66

donyunardi opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@donyunardi
Copy link
Collaborator

donyunardi commented Oct 15, 2024

Summary

We have completed the following enhancements

Let's plan for a release of teal framework packages. We will handle teal modules packages release after this.

Release candidate:

  • teal.logger v0.3.0 (log_shiny_input_changes)
  • teal.reporter v0.4.0 (Archiver Module)
  • teal.code v0.6.0 (introduce names to qenv)
  • teal.widgets v0.5.1 (several bug fixes)
  • teal.data v0.7.0 (deprecate datanames)
  • teal.slice v0.6.0 (insertUI)
  • teal.transform v0.5.1 (minor code update)
  • teal v0.16.0 (teal_transform_module, insertUI)

Blockers

teal.data

teal/teal.slice

Deprecation activity

@m7pr
Copy link

m7pr commented Oct 15, 2024

I think we should do some manual testing on teal.gallery or/and tlg-catalog just in case.
Also review if all pipelines/workflows are green once we release (or before we release).

@m7pr
Copy link

m7pr commented Oct 16, 2024

@donyunardi should we revisit packages for soft deprecated functions and hard deprecate them? Also, for the hard deprecated functions, should we delete them? For example, should we delete all those teal.data functions that got hard deprecated 9 months ago ? https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.data/blob/main/R/deprecated.R

@donyunardi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yeah, good idea. Let's review the deprecated functions in all packages.

For example, should we delete all those teal.data functions that got hard deprecated 9 months ago

I would say yes, 9 months ago is a reasonable time for us to remove this.

@m7pr
Copy link

m7pr commented Oct 17, 2024

@donyunardi @kumamiao what do you think about planning a community meeting with the summary of what got changed during the release? We could record and put that on YouTube and also include the link to the video in the release notes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants