Reintroducing tests for g_lineplot

[Melkiades]

Fixes #820

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files    78 suites   1m 33s ⏱️
   720 tests 720 ✔️     0 💤 0 ❌
1 529 runs  962 ✔️ 567 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 1903f72.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
abnormal_by_marked	💚	$45.51$	$-4.00$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
g_lineplot	👶		$+0.44$	$+2$	$0$	$0$	$0$

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
abnormal_by_marked	💚	$29.15$	$-2.56$	s_count_abnormal_by_marked_works_as_expected
g_lineplot	👶		$+0.35$	g_lineplot_works_with_custom_settings_and_statistics_table
g_lineplot	👶		$+0.09$	g_lineplot_works_with_default_settings

Results for commit fc4af48

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      63       0  100.00%
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        52       5  90.38%   124-128
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           113       3  97.35%   234-236
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   37       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  40       0  100.00%
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                      37       1  97.30%   114
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        138       3  97.83%   133, 243, 260
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    10       0  100.00%
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          47       1  97.87%   60
R/count_missed_doses.R                        31       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R                84       6  92.86%   152-154, 157, 172-173
R/count_occurrences.R                         61       1  98.36%   89
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   72
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 72       0  100.00%
R/count_values.R                              24       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     142       6  95.77%   92, 172-176
R/cox_regression.R                           208      11  94.71%   367-375, 394-396
R/coxph.R                                    168       7  95.83%   224-228, 272, 287, 295, 301-302
R/d_pkparam.R                                405       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            167       6  96.41%   269-275, 382, 414, 424, 431
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     668      68  89.82%   65, 100-101, 141-142, 145, 224, 250-261, 300, 302, 322, 326, 330, 334, 386, 389, 392, 395, 456, 464, 476-477, 483-486, 494, 497, 506, 509, 557-558, 560-561, 563-564, 566-567, 640, 652-665, 670, 717, 730, 734
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  47       1  97.87%   56
R/estimate_proportion.R                      198      11  94.44%   74-81, 85, 90, 458, 565
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/footnotes.R                                  5       0  100.00%
R/formats.R                                  115       3  97.39%   101, 138, 148
R/g_forest.R                                 441      25  94.33%   199, 251-252, 256-257, 324, 341-342, 347-348, 361, 377, 424, 455, 531, 540, 621-625, 635, 703, 706, 830
R/g_lineplot.R                               199      29  85.43%   175, 188, 216, 242-245, 322-329, 347-348, 354-364, 462, 470
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   107
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        74       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    38       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   197-198, 265
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  54       0  100.00%
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           74       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   244-257
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        65       1  98.46%   94
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           78       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   250-262
R/incidence_rate.R                            93       7  92.47%   68-75
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        532      29  94.55%   256-260, 455, 622-624, 632-634, 660, 667-668, 839, 1020, 1258-1269
R/logistic_regression.R                      101       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   30, 61, 71
R/odds_ratio.R                               106       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            87       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                255      12  95.29%   95, 250-257, 398, 461, 572
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   130-134, 174-178
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             59       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       164       4  97.56%   263, 305-307
R/rtables_access.R                            36       2  94.44%   143-144
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   114
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      47       3  93.62%   76-77, 132
R/summarize_ancova.R                          95       1  98.95%   187
R/summarize_change.R                          27       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                          6       0  100.00%
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      164       4  97.56%   181, 186, 249, 318
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    67       5  92.54%   95-97, 189-190
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       46       0  100.00%
R/summarize_variables.R                      212       2  99.06%   264, 467
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             59       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   73       9  87.67%   66-74
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              171       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             47       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       114       7  93.86%   145-151
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_factor.R                              87       1  98.85%   93
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   148, 257-263
R/utils_rtables.R                             84       7  91.67%   25, 32-36, 344-345
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   100, 102, 106, 126, 129, 132, 136, 145-146, 332
R/wrap_text.R                                 66       5  92.42%   38, 59, 79, 86, 108
TOTAL                                       8831     345  96.09%

Diff against main

Filename                   Stmts    Miss  Cover
-----------------------  -------  ------  -------
R/g_lineplot.R                 0    -151  +75.88%
R/summarize_variables.R        0     -18  +8.49%
TOTAL                          0    -169  +1.91%

Results for commit: fc4af48

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[edelarua]

Lgtm! Thanks @Melkiades