Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added var_labels argument #853

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Nolan-Steed
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #852

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      63       0  100.00%
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        52       5  90.38%   126-130
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           113       3  97.35%   230-232
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   37       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  40       0  100.00%
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                      37       1  97.30%   114
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        138       3  97.83%   132, 242, 259
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    10       0  100.00%
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          47       1  97.87%   61
R/count_missed_doses.R                        31       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R                84       6  92.86%   152-154, 157, 172-173
R/count_occurrences.R                         61       1  98.36%   90
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   73
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 72       0  100.00%
R/count_values.R                              24       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     142       6  95.77%   91, 171-175
R/cox_regression.R                           208      11  94.71%   367-375, 394-396
R/coxph.R                                    168       7  95.83%   224-228, 272, 287, 295, 301-302
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            167       6  96.41%   269-275, 382, 414, 424, 431
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     663      66  90.05%   66, 101-102, 142-143, 146, 225, 251-260, 299, 301, 321, 325, 329, 333, 390, 393, 396, 399, 460, 468, 480-481, 487-490, 498, 501, 510, 513, 561-562, 564-565, 567-568, 570-571, 641, 653-666, 671, 718, 731, 735
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  47       1  97.87%   56
R/estimate_proportion.R                      198      11  94.44%   71-78, 82, 87, 450, 551
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/footnotes.R                                 11       0  100.00%
R/formats.R                                  115       3  97.39%   101, 138, 148
R/g_forest.R                                 437      23  94.74%   195, 246-247, 314, 331-332, 337-338, 351, 367, 414, 445, 521, 530, 611-615, 625, 693, 696, 820
R/g_lineplot.R                               199      29  85.43%   162, 175, 203, 229-232, 309-316, 334-335, 341-351, 449, 457
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   107
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        74       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    38       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   197-198, 265
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  54       0  100.00%
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           74       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   242-255
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        65       1  98.46%   93
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           78       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   249-261
R/incidence_rate.R                            93       7  92.47%   69-76
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        567      61  89.24%   258-293, 302-306, 501, 668-670, 678-680, 706, 713-714, 885, 1066, 1304-1315
R/logistic_regression.R                      101       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   30, 61, 71
R/odds_ratio.R                               106       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            88       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                255      12  95.29%   95, 249-256, 395, 457, 566
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   130-134, 174-178
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             59       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       165       4  97.58%   262, 304-306
R/rtables_access.R                            38       4  89.47%   142-145
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   114
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      47       3  93.62%   76-77, 132
R/summarize_ancova.R                          95       1  98.95%   192
R/summarize_change.R                          27       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                          6       0  100.00%
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      164       4  97.56%   180, 185, 247, 316
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    68       5  92.65%   97-99, 193-194
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       47       0  100.00%
R/summarize_variables.R                      212       2  99.06%   266, 476
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             59       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   73       9  87.67%   66-74
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              172       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             47       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       114       7  93.86%   149-155
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_factor.R                              87       1  98.85%   93
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   148, 257-263
R/utils_rtables.R                             86       7  91.86%   25, 32-36, 346-347
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   100, 102, 106, 126, 129, 132, 136, 145-146, 332
TOTAL                                       8807     370  95.80%

Diff against main

Filename              Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------------  -------  ------  --------
R/prop_diff_test.R       +1       0  +100.00%
TOTAL                    +1       0  +0.00%

Results for commit: d5d36fb

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

Copy link
Contributor

@ayogasekaram ayogasekaram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm @Nolan-Steed!

@Nolan-Steed Nolan-Steed enabled auto-merge (squash) March 10, 2023 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

@shajoezhu shajoezhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @Nolan-Steed , can you check if the tests need to be updated as well please. thanks

@Nolan-Steed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @shajoezhu all of the tests still passed. I added the variable label to a couple of the tests that existed to make sure that no warnings or errors occur with this added to the test_proportion_diff function.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files    77 suites   1m 42s ⏱️
   720 tests 720 ✔️     0 💤 0
1 532 runs  965 ✔️ 567 💤 0

Results for commit d5911a9.

@Nolan-Steed Nolan-Steed merged commit 56a958e into main Mar 10, 2023
@Nolan-Steed Nolan-Steed deleted the 852_test_proportion_diff_label@main branch March 10, 2023 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Cannot display label in test_proportion_diff
3 participants